mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

RLAR: An Agentic Reward System for Multi-task Reinforcement Learning on Large Language Models

arXiv 2603.00724 ↗First posted 28 Feb 2026cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Reinforcement learning for LLM agents

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Large language model alignment via reinforcement learning depends critically on reward function quality. However, static, domain-specific reward models are often costly to train and exhibit poor generalization in out-of-distribution scenarios encountered during RL iterations. We present RLAR (Reinforcement Learning from Agent Rewards), an agent-driven framework that dynamically assigns tailored reward functions to individual queries. Specifically, RLAR transforms reward acquisition into a dynamic tool synthesis and invocation task. It leverages LLM agents to autonomously retrieve optimal reward models from the Internet and synthesize programmatic verifiers through code generation. This allows the reward system to self-evolve with the shifting data distributions during training. Experimental results demonstrate that RLAR yields consistent performance gains ranging from 10 to 60 across mathematics, coding, translation, and dialogue tasks. On RewardBench-V2, RLAR significantly outperforms static baselines and approaches the performance upper bound, demonstrating superior generalization through dynamic reward orchestration. The data and code are available on this link: https://github.com/ZhuoerFeng/RLAR.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for LLM agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 29 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Feb 2026.

Builds on

29 of 39 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Agentic Reward Modeling: Integrating Human Preferences with Verifiable Correctness Signals for Reliable Reward Systems26 Feb

Other references · 28

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  4. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  5. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  6. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  7. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
  8. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,050
  9. 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 825
  10. 2021The FLORES-101 Evaluation Benchmark for Low-Resource and Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 556
  11. 2018A Discourse-Aware Attention Model for Abstractive Summarization of Long Documentscited by 477
  12. 2024Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Predictioncited by 465
16 more
  1. 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 402
  2. 2024Skywork-Reward: Bag of Tricks for Reward Modeling in LLMscited by 322
  3. 2023PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning Optimizationcited by 311
  4. 2024Rewards-in-Context: Multi-objective Alignment of Foundation Models with Dynamic Preference Adjustmentcited by 171
  5. 2025RewardBench 2: Advancing Reward Model Evaluationcited by 136
  6. 2025Preference Leakage: A Contamination Problem in LLM-as-a-judgecited by 119
  7. 2025Critique-GRPO: Advancing LLM Reasoning with Natural Language and Numerical Feedbackcited by 86
  8. 2025LeetCodeDataset: A Temporal Dataset for Robust Evaluation and Efficient Training of Code LLMscited by 67
  9. 2023CritiqueLLM: Towards an Informative Critique Generation Model for Evaluation of Large Language Model Generationcited by 65
  10. 2019The FLoRes Evaluation Datasets for Low-Resource Machine Translation: Nepali-English and Sinhala-Englishcited by 61
  11. 2025No Free Labels: Limitations of LLM-as-a-Judge Without Human Groundingcited by 50
  12. 2022EAGER: Asking and Answering Questions for Automatic Reward Shaping in Language-guided RLcited by 23
  13. 2025Llama-3.1-FoundationAI-SecurityLLM-8B-Instruct Technical Reportcited by 21
  14. 2025BLEUBERI: BLEU is a surprisingly effective reward for instruction followingcited by 17
  15. 2025ToolRM: Outcome Reward Models for Tool-Calling Large Language Modelscited by 16
  16. 2024Dynamic Rewarding with Prompt Optimization Enables Tuning-free Self-Alignment of Language Modelscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Online Intrinsic Rewards for Decision Making Agents from Large Language Model Feedback
  2. 2025Enhancing Agentic RL with Progressive Reward Shaping and Value-based Sampling Policy Optimization
  3. 2025Self-correcting Reward Shaping via Language Models for Reinforcement Learning Agents in Games
  4. 2025Tool-R1: Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning for Agentic Tool Use
  5. 2025Agent-R1: A Unified and Modular Framework for Agentic Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2025Boosting Universal LLM Reward Design through Heuristic Reward Observation Space Evolution
  7. 2026The End of Reward Engineering: How LLMs Are Redefining Multi-Agent Coordination
  8. 2023Reward Design with Language Models