mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

From Glue-Code to Protocols: A Critical Analysis of A2A and MCP Integration for Scalable Agent Systems

arXiv 2505.03864 ↗First posted 6 May 2025cs.MA cs.AI cs.LGcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial intelligence is rapidly evolving towards multi-agent systems where numerous AI agents collaborate and interact with external tools. Two key open standards, Google's Agent to Agent (A2A) protocol for inter-agent communication and Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) for standardized tool access, promise to overcome the limitations of fragmented, custom integration approaches. While their potential synergy is significant, this paper argues that effectively integrating A2A and MCP presents unique, emergent challenges at their intersection, particularly concerning semantic interoperability between agent tasks and tool capabilities, the compounded security risks arising from combined discovery and execution, and the practical governance required for the envisioned "Agent Economy". This work provides a critical analysis, moving beyond a survey to evaluate the practical implications and inherent difficulties of combining these horizontal and vertical integration standards. We examine the benefits (e.g., specialization, scalability) while critically assessing their dependencies and trade-offs in an integrated context. We identify key challenges increased by the integration, including novel security vulnerabilities, privacy complexities, debugging difficulties across protocols, and the need for robust semantic negotiation mechanisms. In summary, A2A+MCP offers a vital architectural foundation, but fully realizing its potential requires substantial advancements to manage the complexities of their combined operation.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2025.

Builds on

24 of 46 references.

References · 24

  1. 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,439
  2. 2023HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Facecited by 1,190
  3. 2024ToolSandbox: A Stateful, Conversational, Interactive Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Tool Use Capabilitiescited by 295
  4. 2025Model Context Protocol (MCP): Landscape, Security Threats, and Future Research Directionscited by 265
  5. 2024The Emerged Security and Privacy of LLM Agent: A Survey with Case Studiescited by 131
  6. 2024AI Agents Under Threat: A Survey of Key Security Challenges and Future Pathwayscited by 127
  7. 2025A Survey of AI Agent Protocolscited by 81
  8. 2024Imprompter: Tricking LLM Agents into Improper Tool Usecited by 68
  9. 2024Navigating the Risks: A Survey of Security, Privacy, and Ethics Threats in LLM-Based Agentscited by 65
  10. 2024LLM With Tools: A Surveycited by 61
  11. 2024Tool Learning in the Wild: Empowering Language Models as Automatic Tool Agentscited by 56
  12. 2025LLM Agents Making Agent Toolscited by 48
12 more
  1. 2025Enterprise-Grade Security for the Model Context Protocol (MCP): Frameworks and Mitigation Strategiescited by 42
  2. 2025Multi-Agent Coordination across Diverse Applications: A Surveycited by 37
  3. 2024Agent-Oriented Planning in Multi-Agent Systemscited by 36
  4. 2024A Survey on Context-Aware Multi-Agent Systems: Techniques, Challenges and Future Directionscited by 27
  5. 2025Multi-Agent Security Tax: Trading Off Security and Collaboration Capabilities in Multi-Agent Systemscited by 27
  6. 2025AI Agents: Evolution, Architecture, and Real-World Applicationscited by 19
  7. 2025ToolFuzz -- Automated Agent Tool Testingcited by 18
  8. 2025Securing GenAI Multi-Agent Systems Against Tool Squatting: A Zero Trust Registry-Based Approachcited by 18
  9. 2021Will bots take over the supply chain? Revisiting Agent-based supply chain automationcited by 7
  10. 2025Can We Govern the Agent-to-Agent Economy?cited by 7
  11. 2025Can Proof Assistants Verify Multi-Agent Systems?cited by 3
  12. 2023Multi-Agent Verification and Control with Probabilistic Model Checkingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 8; 2026: 6.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025A Study on the MCP x A2A Framework for Enhancing Interoperability of LLM-based Autonomous Agents
  2. 2026Beyond Context Sharing: A Unified Agent Communication Protocol (ACP) for Secure, Federated, and Autonomous Agent-to-Agent (A2A) Orchestration
  3. 2026A2ABreak: Systematic Security Analysis of the A2A Protocol ↗
  4. 2025Building A Secure Agentic AI Application Leveraging A2A Protocol
  5. 2025A survey of agent interoperability protocols: Model Context Protocol (MCP), Agent Communication Protocol (ACP), Agent-to-Agent Protocol (A2A), and Agent Network Protocol (ANP)
  6. 2026A Formal Security Framework for MCP-Based AI Agents: Threat Taxonomy, Verification Models, and Defense Mechanisms
  7. 2026Security Threat Modeling for Emerging AI-Agent Protocols: A Comparative Analysis of MCP, A2A, Agora, and ANP
  8. 2025AgentBound: Securing Execution Boundaries of AI Agents