LRAGE: Legal Retrieval Augmented Generation Evaluation Tool
On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Legal and financial RAG
Abstract (arXiv)
Recently, building retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems to enhance the capability of large language models (LLMs) has become a common practice. Especially in the legal domain, previous judicial decisions play a significant role under the doctrine of stare decisis which emphasizes the importance of making decisions based on (retrieved) prior documents. However, the overall performance of RAG system depends on many components: (1) retrieval corpora, (2) retrieval algorithms, (3) rerankers, (4) LLM backbones, and (5) evaluation metrics. Here we propose LRAGE, an open-source tool for holistic evaluation of RAG systems focusing on the legal domain. LRAGE provides GUI and CLI interfaces to facilitate seamless experiments and investigate how changes in the aforementioned five components affect the overall accuracy. We validated LRAGE using multilingual legal benches including Korean (KBL), English (LegalBench), and Chinese (LawBench) by demonstrating how the overall accuracy changes when varying the five components mentioned above. The source code is available at https://github.com/hoorangyee/LRAGE.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Legal and financial RAG, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 24 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2025.
Builds on
24 of 37 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2024LegalBench-RAG: A Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation in the Legal Domain19 Aug
- 2024CLERC: A Dataset for Legal Case Retrieval and Retrieval-Augmented Analysis Generation24 Jun
Other references · 22
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,259
- 2020ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERTcited by 1,160
- 2024M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillationcited by 1,050
- 2023Enabling Large Language Models to Generate Text with Citationscited by 584
- 2024Multilingual E5 Text Embeddings: A Technical Reportcited by 357
- 2023RAGTruth: A Hallucination Corpus for Developing Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 272
- 2024Hallucination-Free? Assessing the Reliability of Leading AI Legal Research Toolscited by 170
- 2018CAIL2018: A Large-Scale Legal Dataset for Judgment Predictioncited by 168
- 2022Pile of Law: Learning Responsible Data Filtering from the Law and a 256GB Open-Source Legal Datasetcited by 113
- 2024The BiGGen Bench: A Principled Benchmark for Fine-grained Evaluation of Language Models with Language Modelscited by 89
10 more
- 2023SAILER: Structure-aware Pre-trained Language Model for Legal Case Retrievalcited by 61
- 2023LeXFiles and LegalLAMA: Facilitating English Multinational Legal Language Model Developmentcited by 54
- 2022A Multi-Task Benchmark for Korean Legal Language Understanding and Judgement Predictioncited by 44
- 2023LeCaRDv2: A Large-Scale Chinese Legal Case Retrieval Datasetcited by 37
- 2024BERGEN: A Benchmarking Library for Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 31
- 2024EXAONE 3.0 7.8B Instruction Tuned Language Modelcited by 20
- 2023Can ChatGPT Perform Reasoning Using the IRAC Method in Analyzing Legal Scenarios Like a Lawyer?cited by 12
- 2024Enhancing Legal Case Retrieval via Scaling High-quality Synthetic Query-Candidate Pairscited by 11
- 2024rerankers: A Lightweight Python Library to Unify Ranking Methodscited by 8
- 2025Taxation Perspectives from Large Language Models: A Case Study on Additional Tax Penaltiescited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.
5 papers.
- 2026Fine-grained Claim-level RAG Benchmark for Lawcited by 2
- 2026Can LLMs Time Travel? Enhancing Temporal Consistency in Legal Agentic Search through Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2025Na Pr'atica, qual IA Entende o Direito? Um Estudo Experimental com IAs Generalistas e uma IA Jur'idicacited by 0
- 2026Chinese Labor Law Large Language Model Benchmarkcited by 0
- 2026Can Small Models Reason About Legal Documents? A Comparative Studycited by 0
- 2026Can LLMs Time Travel? Enhancing Temporal Consistency in Legal Agentic Search through Reinforcement Learning25 May 2026
- 2026Fine-grained Claim-level RAG Benchmark for Law20 May 2026
- 2026Can Small Models Reason About Legal Documents? A Comparative Study26 Mar 2026
- 2026Chinese Labor Law Large Language Model Benchmark15 Jan 2026
- 2025Na Pr'atica, qual IA Entende o Direito? Um Estudo Experimental com IAs Generalistas e uma IA Jur'idica20 Oct 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025LexRAG: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Multi-Turn Legal Consultation Conversation
- 2025All for law and law for all: Adaptive RAG Pipeline for Legal Research
- 2026Enhancing Legal LLMs through Metadata-Enriched RAG Pipelines and Direct Preference Optimization
- 2026Legal-DC: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Legal Documents
- 2025ASVRI-Legal: Fine-Tuning LLMs with Retrieval Augmented Generation for Enhanced Legal Regulation
- 2025Towards Reliable Retrieval in RAG Systems for Large Legal Datasets
- 2025LegalRAG: A Hybrid RAG System for Multilingual Legal Information Retrieval
- 2025Retrieval Augmented Generation Evaluation in the Era of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey