mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LeCaRDv2: A Large-Scale Chinese Legal Case Retrieval Dataset

arXiv 2310.17609 ↗First posted 26 Oct 2023cs.CL cs.IRcited by 37

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As an important component of intelligent legal systems, legal case retrieval plays a critical role in ensuring judicial justice and fairness. However, the development of legal case retrieval technologies in the Chinese legal system is restricted by three problems in existing datasets: limited data size, narrow definitions of legal relevance, and naive candidate pooling strategies used in data sampling. To alleviate these issues, we introduce LeCaRDv2, a large-scale Legal Case Retrieval Dataset (version 2). It consists of 800 queries and 55,192 candidates extracted from 4.3 million criminal case documents. To the best of our knowledge, LeCaRDv2 is one of the largest Chinese legal case retrieval datasets, providing extensive coverage of criminal charges. Additionally, we enrich the existing relevance criteria by considering three key aspects: characterization, penalty, procedure. This comprehensive criteria enriches the dataset and may provides a more holistic perspective. Furthermore, we propose a two-level candidate set pooling strategy that effectively identify potential candidates for each query case. It's important to note that all cases in the dataset have been annotated by multiple legal experts specializing in criminal law. Their expertise ensures the accuracy and reliability of the annotations. We evaluate several state-of-the-art retrieval models at LeCaRDv2, demonstrating that there is still significant room for improvement in legal case retrieval. The details of LeCaRDv2 can be found at the anonymous website https://github.com/anonymous1113243/LeCaRDv2.

Key facts. Cited by 37 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2023.

Builds on

17 of 37 references.

References · 17

  1. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  2. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
  3. 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,362
  4. 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,591
  5. 2021Unsupervised Corpus Aware Language Model Pre-training for Dense Passage Retrievalcited by 203
  6. 2021Condenser: a Pre-training Architecture for Dense Retrievalcited by 162
  7. 2021Lawformer: A Pre-trained Language Model for Chinese Legal Long Documentscited by 115
  8. 2023SAILER: Structure-aware Pre-trained Language Model for Legal Case Retrievalcited by 61
  9. 2023T2Ranking: A large-scale Chinese Benchmark for Passage Rankingcited by 59
  10. 2020RepBERT: Contextualized Text Embeddings for First-Stage Retrievalcited by 46
  11. 2022Legal Case Document Similarity: You Need Both Network and Textcited by 16
  12. 2023THUIR@COLIEE 2023: Incorporating Structural Knowledge into Pre-trained Language Models for Legal Case Retrievalcited by 16
5 more
  1. 2023Constructing Tree-based Index for Efficient and Effective Dense Retrievalcited by 15
  2. 2023THUIR@COLIEE 2023: More Parameters and Legal Knowledge for Legal Case Entailmentcited by 11
  3. 2021Less is More: Pre-train a Strong Text Encoder for Dense Retrieval Using a Weak Decodercited by 7
  4. 2023An Intent Taxonomy of Legal Case Retrievalcited by 6
  5. 2023I^3 Retriever: Incorporating Implicit Interaction in Pre-trained Language Models for Passage Retrievalcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 9; 2025: 14; 2026: 14.

37 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillationcited by 1,050
  2. 2024LegalAgentBench: Evaluating LLM Agents in Legal Domaincited by 56
  3. 2024LexEval: A Comprehensive Chinese Legal Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Modelscited by 36
  4. 2024CalibraEval: Calibrating Prediction Distribution to Mitigate Selection Bias in LLMs-as-Judgescited by 32
  5. 2025LexRAG: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Multi-Turn Legal Consultation Conversationcited by 19
  6. 2024CLERC: A Dataset for Legal Case Retrieval and Retrieval-Augmented Analysis Generationcited by 18
  7. 2025IFIR: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Instruction-Following in Expert-Domain Information Retrievalcited by 16
  8. 2024Learning Interpretable Legal Case Retrieval via Knowledge-Guided Case Reformulationcited by 15
  9. 2026PLawBench: A Rubric-Based Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Real-World Legal Practicecited by 13
  10. 2024DELTA: Pre-train a Discriminative Encoder for Legal Case Retrieval via Structural Word Alignmentcited by 9
  11. 2025Large Language Models Meet Legal Artificial Intelligence: A Surveycited by 9
  12. 2025CaseGen: A Benchmark for Multi-Stage Legal Case Documents Generationcited by 8
25 more
  1. 2025Chinese Court Simulation with LLM-Based Agent Systemcited by 7
  2. 2024Exploring the Nexus of Large Language Models and Legal Systems: A Short Surveycited by 6
  3. 2025GuRE:Generative Query REwriter for Legal Passage Retrievalcited by 6
  4. 2025LRAGE: Legal Retrieval Augmented Generation Evaluation Toolcited by 5
  5. 2025LegalSearchLM: Rethinking Legal Case Retrieval as Legal Elements Generationcited by 5
  6. 2025Towards Trustworthy Legal AI through LLM Agents and Formal Reasoningcited by 4
  7. 2025LexGenius: An Expert-Level Benchmark for Large Language Models in Legal General Intelligencecited by 3
  8. 2025Computational Law: Datasets, Benchmarks, and Ontologiescited by 2
  9. 2025LLM-based Embedders for Prior Case Retrievalcited by 2
  10. 2026LegalCiteBench: Evaluating Citation Reliability in Legal Language Modelscited by 2
  11. 2024Unlocking Multi-View Insights in Knowledge-Dense Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 1
  12. 2026Evaluation of Large Language Models in Legal Applications: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1
  13. 2026TrafficRAG: A Multimodal RAG Framework for Traffic Accident Liability Determinationcited by 1
  14. 2026LexRubric: A Rubric-Guided Diagnostic Benchmark for Open-Ended Legal Taskscited by 1
  15. 2025Improving Similar Case Retrieval Ranking Performance By Revisiting RankSVMcited by 0
  16. 2025Query Generation Pipeline with Enhanced Answerability Assessment for Financial Information Retrievalcited by 0
  17. 2026Influence Guided Sampling for Domain Adaptation of Text Retrieverscited by 0
  18. 2026GLIER: Generative Legal Inference and Evidence Ranking for Legal Case Retrievalcited by 0
  19. 2026Which Changes Matter? Towards Trustworthy Legal AI via Relevance-Sensitive Evaluation and Solver-Grounded Reasoningcited by 0
  20. 2026Civil Court Simulation with Large Language Modelscited by 0
  21. 2026When Rules Learn: A Self-Evolving Agent for Legal Case Retrievalcited by 0
  22. 2026HAKARI-Bench: A Lightweight Benchmark for Comparing Retrieval Architectures and Efficiency Settings under Unified Conditionscited by 0
  23. 2026GreekBarRetrieval: A Benchmark for Greek Statutory Retrievalcited by 0
  24. 2026C-HAT-Bench: Benchmarking Chinese AI-Text Detection Beyond Fully Generated Textcited by 0
  25. 2026Chinese-Jev: Bringing System One Model to Chinese-Language Taskscited by 0