Enhancing Legal Case Retrieval via Scaling High-quality Synthetic Query-Candidate Pairs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Legal case retrieval (LCR) aims to provide similar cases as references for a given fact description. This task is crucial for promoting consistent judgments in similar cases, effectively enhancing judicial fairness and improving work efficiency for judges. However, existing works face two main challenges for real-world applications: existing works mainly focus on case-to-case retrieval using lengthy queries, which does not match real-world scenarios; and the limited data scale, with current datasets containing only hundreds of queries, is insufficient to satisfy the training requirements of existing data-hungry neural models. To address these issues, we introduce an automated method to construct synthetic query-candidate pairs and build the largest LCR dataset to date, LEAD, which is hundreds of times larger than existing datasets. This data construction method can provide ample training signals for LCR models. Experimental results demonstrate that model training with our constructed data can achieve state-of-the-art results on two widely-used LCR benchmarks. Besides, the construction method can also be applied to civil cases and achieve promising results. The data and codes can be found in https://github.com/thunlp/LEAD.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 5.
11 papers.
- 2025GuRE:Generative Query REwriter for Legal Passage Retrievalcited by 6
- 2025LRAGE: Legal Retrieval Augmented Generation Evaluation Toolcited by 5
- 2025Towards Trustworthy Legal AI through LLM Agents and Formal Reasoningcited by 5
- 2025ASP2LJ : An Adversarial Self-Play Laywer Augmented Legal Judgment Frameworkcited by 3
- 2026Evaluation of Large Language Models in Legal Applications: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1
- 2026Kernel Affine Hull Machines as Compute-Efficient Encoders for Frozen Semantic Spacescited by 1
- 2026LegalWorld: A Life-Cycle Interactive Environment for Legal Agentscited by 1
- 2025Legal Document Summarization: Enhancing Judicial Efficiency through Automation Detectioncited by 0
- 2025PL-CA: A Parametric Legal Case Augmentation Frameworkcited by 0
- 2026STELLA: Self-Reflective Terminology-Aware Framework for Building an Aerospace Information Retrieval Benchmarkcited by 0
- 2026GLIER: Generative Legal Inference and Evidence Ranking for Legal Case Retrievalcited by 0
- 2026LegalWorld: A Life-Cycle Interactive Environment for Legal Agents17 Jun 2026
- 2026Kernel Affine Hull Machines as Compute-Efficient Encoders for Frozen Semantic Spaces1 May 2026
- 2026GLIER: Generative Legal Inference and Evidence Ranking for Legal Case Retrieval26 Apr 2026
- 2026Evaluation of Large Language Models in Legal Applications: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directions21 Jan 2026
- 2026STELLA: Self-Reflective Terminology-Aware Framework for Building an Aerospace Information Retrieval Benchmark7 Jan 2026
- 2025Towards Trustworthy Legal AI through LLM Agents and Formal Reasoning26 Nov 2025
- 2025PL-CA: A Parametric Legal Case Augmentation Framework8 Sep 2025
- 2025Legal Document Summarization: Enhancing Judicial Efficiency through Automation Detection25 Jul 2025
- 2025ASP2LJ : An Adversarial Self-Play Laywer Augmented Legal Judgment Framework11 Jun 2025
- 2025GuRE:Generative Query REwriter for Legal Passage Retrieval19 May 2025
- 2025LRAGE: Legal Retrieval Augmented Generation Evaluation Tool2 Apr 2025