mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Intrinsically-Motivated Humans and Agents in Open-World Exploration

arXiv 2503.23631 ↗First posted 31 Mar 2025cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

What drives exploration? Understanding intrinsic motivation is a long-standing challenge in both cognitive science and artificial intelligence; numerous objectives have been proposed and used to train agents, yet there remains a gap between human and agent exploration. We directly compare adults, children, and AI agents in a complex open-ended environment, Crafter, and study how common intrinsic objectives: Entropy, Information Gain, and Empowerment, relate to their behavior. We find that only Entropy and Empowerment are consistently positively correlated with human exploration progress, indicating that these objectives may better inform intrinsic reward design for agents. Furthermore, across agents and humans we observe that Entropy initially increases rapidly, then plateaus, while Empowerment increases continuously, suggesting that state diversity may provide more signal in early exploration, while advanced exploration should prioritize control. Finally, we find preliminary evidence that private speech utterances, and particularly goal verbalizations, may aid exploration in children. Our data is available at https://github.com/alyd/humans_in_crafter_data.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2025.

Builds on

26 of 66 references.

References · 26

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  2. 2024OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 2,777
  3. 2023Mastering Diverse Domains through World Modelscited by 1,193
  4. 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,173
  5. 2018Exploration by Random Network Distillationcited by 966
  6. 2017Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 774
  7. 2019Self-Supervised Exploration via Disagreementcited by 263
  8. 2016Variational Intrinsic Controlcited by 262
  9. 2018Provably Efficient Maximum Entropy Explorationcited by 240
  10. 2021Benchmarking the Spectrum of Agent Capabilitiescited by 193
  11. 2023Guiding Pretraining in Reinforcement Learning with Large Language Modelscited by 185
  12. 2021Reinforcement Learning with Prototypical Representationscited by 179
14 more
  1. 2021Behavior From the Void: Unsupervised Active Pre-Trainingcited by 173
  2. 2020Automatic Curriculum Learning For Deep RL: A Short Surveycited by 141
  3. 2020Autotelic Agents with Intrinsically Motivated Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning: a Short Surveycited by 83
  4. 2019A survey on intrinsic motivation in reinforcement learningcited by 79
  5. 2024Open-Endedness is Essential for Artificial Superhuman Intelligencecited by 79
  6. 2023OMNI: Open-endedness via Models of human Notions of Interestingnesscited by 66
  7. 2013Empowerment -- an Introductioncited by 65
  8. 2018Investigating Human Priors for Playing Video Gamescited by 39
  9. 2022An information-theoretic perspective on intrinsic motivation in reinforcement learning: a surveycited by 25
  10. 2014Changing the Environment Based on Empowerment as Intrinsic Motivationcited by 9
  11. 2022Learning Causal Overhypotheses through Exploration in Children and Computational Modelscited by 7
  12. 2020Exploring Exploration: Comparing Children with RL Agents in Unified Environmentscited by 5
  13. 2020Evaluating Agents without Rewardscited by 4
  14. 2024BAMDP Shaping: a Unified Framework for Intrinsic Motivation and Reward Shapingcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

6 papers.