mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Collab: Controlled Decoding using Mixture of Agents for LLM Alignment

arXiv 2503.21720 ↗First posted 27 Mar 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 13

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Alignment of Large Language models (LLMs) is crucial for safe and trustworthy deployment in applications. Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has emerged as an effective technique to align LLMs to human preferences and broader utilities, but it requires updating billions of model parameters, which is computationally expensive. Controlled Decoding, by contrast, provides a mechanism for aligning a model at inference time without retraining. However, single-agent decoding approaches often struggle to adapt to diverse tasks due to the complexity and variability inherent in these tasks. To strengthen the test-time performance w.r.t the target task, we propose a mixture of agent-based decoding strategies leveraging the existing off-the-shelf aligned LLM policies. Treating each prior policy as an agent in the spirit of mixture of agent collaboration, we develop a decoding method that allows for inference-time alignment through a token-level selection strategy among multiple agents. For each token, the most suitable LLM is dynamically chosen from a pool of models based on a long-term utility metric. This policy-switching mechanism ensures optimal model selection at each step, enabling efficient collaboration and alignment among LLMs during decoding. Theoretical analysis of our proposed algorithm establishes optimal performance with respect to the target task represented via a target reward for the given off-the-shelf models. We conduct comprehensive empirical evaluations with open-source aligned models on diverse tasks and preferences, which demonstrates the merits of this approach over single-agent decoding baselines. Notably, Collab surpasses the current SoTA decoding strategy, achieving an improvement of up to 1.56x in average reward and 71.89% in GPT-4 based win-tie rate.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 21 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2025.

Builds on

21 of 29 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  3. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  4. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  5. 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedbackcited by 1,722
  6. 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,056
  7. 2024Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Modelscited by 552
  8. 2021FUDGE: Controlled Text Generation With Future Discriminatorscited by 374
  9. 2023Personalized Soups: Personalized Large Language Model Alignment via Post-hoc Parameter Mergingcited by 271
  10. 2022A Contrastive Framework for Neural Text Generationcited by 224
  11. 2024SORRY-Bench: Systematically Evaluating Large Language Model Safety Refusalcited by 224
  12. 2024Attacks, Defenses and Evaluations for LLM Conversation Safety: A Surveycited by 124
9 more
  1. 2023Aligning Language Models with Preferences through f-divergence Minimizationcited by 118
  2. 2024Learning to Decode Collaboratively with Multiple Language Modelscited by 61
  3. 2024Iterative Data Smoothing: Mitigating Reward Overfitting and Overoptimization in RLHFcited by 57
  4. 2024DeAL: Decoding-time Alignment for Large Language Modelscited by 55
  5. 2024Controllable Text Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 55
  6. 2024Transfer Q Star: Principled Decoding for LLM Alignmentcited by 46
  7. 2024Personalized Large Language Modelscited by 44
  8. 2023PARL: A Unified Framework for Policy Alignment in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 38
  9. 2024Collaborative decoding of critical tokens for boosting factuality of large language modelscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 10; 2026: 3.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Controlled Decoding from Language Models
  2. 2024Decoding-Time Language Model Alignment with Multiple Objectives
  3. 2025Improving Model Alignment Through Collective Intelligence of Open-Source LLMS
  4. 2024Aligning Large Language Models with Representation Editing: A Control Perspective
  5. 2025Aligning Frozen LLMs by Reinforcement Learning: An Iterative Reweight-then-Optimize Approach
  6. 2025Safety Game: Inference-Time Alignment of Black-Box LLMs via Constrained Optimization
  7. 2025Decoding Alignment: A Critical Survey of LLM Development Initiatives through Value-setting and Data-centric Lens
  8. 2024Nudging: Inference-time Alignment of LLMs via Guided Decoding