mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Collaborative decoding of critical tokens for boosting factuality of large language models

arXiv 2402.17982 ↗First posted 28 Feb 2024cs.CLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The most common training pipeline for large language models includes pretraining, finetuning and aligning phases, with their respective resulting models, such as the pretrained model and the finetuned model. Finetuned and aligned models show improved abilities of instruction following and safe generation, however their abilities to stay factual about the world are impacted by the finetuning process. Furthermore, the common practice of using sampling during generation also increases chances of hallucination. In this work, we introduce a collaborative decoding framework to harness the high factuality within pretrained models through the concept of critical tokens. We first design a critical token classifier to decide which model to use for the next token, and subsequently generates the next token using different decoding strategies. Experiments with different models and datasets show that our decoding framework is able to reduce model hallucination significantly, showcasing the importance of the collaborative decoding framework.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Feb 2024.

Builds on

23 of 38 references.

References · 23

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  3. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  4. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  5. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
  6. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  7. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
  8. 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,185
  9. 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,259
  10. 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,259
  11. 2022Atlas: Few-shot Learning with Retrieval Augmented Language Modelscited by 940
  12. 2021Retrieval Augmentation Reduces Hallucination in Conversationcited by 691
11 more
  1. 2022Contrastive Decoding: Open-ended Text Generation as Optimizationcited by 598
  2. 2023Fine-tuning Language Models for Factualitycited by 219
  3. 2023Survey on Factuality in Large Language Models: Knowledge, Retrieval and Domain-Specificitycited by 204
  4. 2023Mitigating the Alignment Tax of RLHFcited by 181
  5. 2023Chain-of-Note: Enhancing Robustness in Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 180
  6. 2023LLM Lies: Hallucinations are not Bugs, but Features as Adversarial Examplescited by 177
  7. 2023Verify-and-Edit: A Knowledge-Enhanced Chain-of-Thought Frameworkcited by 139
  8. 2023The Troubling Emergence of Hallucination in Large Language Models -- An Extensive Definition, Quantification, and Prescriptive Remediationscited by 130
  9. 2024A Thorough Examination of Decoding Methods in the Era of LLMscited by 112
  10. 2023Alleviating Hallucinations of Large Language Models through Induced Hallucinationscited by 78
  11. 2022COLD: A Benchmark for Chinese Offensive Language Detectioncited by 74

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

9 papers.