mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

LiDAR Remote Sensing Meets Weak Supervision: Concepts, Methods, and Perspectives

arXiv 2503.18384 ↗First posted 24 Mar 2025cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) remote sensing encompasses two major directions: data interpretation and parameter inversion. However, both directions rely heavily on costly and labor-intensive labeled data and field measurements, which constrains their scalability and spatiotemporal adaptability. Weakly Supervised Learning (WSL) provides a unified framework to address these limitations. This paper departs from the traditional view that treats interpretation and inversion as separate tasks and offers a systematic review of recent advances in LiDAR remote sensing from a unified WSL perspective. We cover typical WSL settings including incomplete supervision(e.g., sparse point labels), inexact supervision (e.g., scene-level tags), inaccurate supervision (e.g., noisy labels), and cross-domain supervision (e.g., domain adaptation/generalization) and corresponding techniques such as pseudo-labeling, consistency regularization, self-training, and label refinement, which collectively enable robust learning from limited and weak annotations.We further analyze LiDAR-specific challenges (e.g., irregular geometry, data sparsity, domain heterogeneity) that require tailored weak supervision, and examine how sparse LiDAR observations can guide joint learning with other remote-sensing data for continuous surface-parameter retrieval. Finally, we highlight future directions where WSL acts as a bridge between LiDAR and foundation models to leverage large-scale multimodal datasets and reduce labeling costs, while also enabling broader WSL-driven advances in generalization, open-world adaptation, and scalable LiDAR remote sensing.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 179 of its 367 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2025.

Builds on

179 of 367 references.

References · 179

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  3. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  4. 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,248
  5. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  6. 2017PointNet++: Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning on Point Sets in a Metric Spacecited by 4,401
  7. 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,015
  8. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
  9. 2018Dynamic Graph CNN for Learning on Point Cloudscited by 2,223
  10. 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,917
  11. 2020Point Transformercited by 1,470
  12. 2017VoxelNet: End-to-End Learning for Point Cloud Based 3D Object Detectioncited by 1,323
38 more
  1. 20194D Spatio-Temporal ConvNets: Minkowski Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 1,208
  2. 2019KPConv: Flexible and Deformable Convolution for Point Cloudscited by 1,205
  3. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
  4. 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 848
  5. 2021Domain Generalization: A Surveycited by 764
  6. 2019RandLA-Net: Efficient Semantic Segmentation of Large-Scale Point Cloudscited by 585
  7. 2022OpenScene: 3D Scene Understanding with Open Vocabulariescited by 559
  8. 2019Deep Learning for 3D Point Clouds: A Surveycited by 558
  9. 2023Segment Everything Everywhere All at Oncecited by 548
  10. 2020PointContrast: Unsupervised Pre-training for 3D Point Cloud Understandingcited by 504
  11. 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 469
  12. 2020Searching Efficient 3D Architectures with Sparse Point-Voxel Convolutioncited by 423
  13. 2020A Simple Semi-Supervised Learning Framework for Object Detectioncited by 282
  14. 2022Contrastive Test-Time Adaptationcited by 261
  15. 2020Exploring Data-Efficient 3D Scene Understanding with Contrastive Scene Contextscited by 210
  16. 2023CLIP2Scene: Towards Label-efficient 3D Scene Understanding by CLIPcited by 181
  17. 2021Source-Free Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentationcited by 168
  18. 2021ST3D: Self-training for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation on 3D Object Detectioncited by 159
  19. 2017Semantic3D.net: A new Large-scale Point Cloud Classification Benchmarkcited by 158
  20. 2019A review of domain adaptation without target labelscited by 156
  21. 2021Model Adaptation: Historical Contrastive Learning for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation without Source Datacited by 152
  22. 2018Task-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Few-shot Learningcited by 151
  23. 2021Offboard 3D Object Detection from Point Cloud Sequencescited by 145
  24. 2021The Norm Must Go On: Dynamic Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Normalizationcited by 131
  25. 2020Self-Adaptive Training: beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 126
  26. 2023Segment Any Point Cloud Sequences by Distilling Vision Foundation Modelscited by 125
  27. 2020Complete & Label: A Domain Adaptation Approach to Semantic Segmentation of LiDAR Point Cloudscited by 116
  28. 2019PointDAN: A Multi-Scale 3D Domain Adaption Network for Point Cloud Representationcited by 114
  29. 2019ShellNet: Efficient Point Cloud Convolutional Neural Networks using Concentric Shells Statisticscited by 104
  30. 2022Robust Mean Teacher for Continual and Gradual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 104
  31. 2023TTN: A Domain-Shift Aware Batch Normalization in Test-Time Adaptationcited by 101
  32. 2020Self-Supervised Learning for Domain Adaptation on Point-Cloudscited by 99
  33. 2022Test-Time Adaptation via Conjugate Pseudo-labelscited by 98
  34. 2019ViewAL: Active Learning with Viewpoint Entropy for Semantic Segmentationcited by 96
  35. 2023LiDAR-LLM: Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models for 3D LiDAR Understandingcited by 95
  36. 2022LaserMix for Semi-Supervised LiDAR Semantic Segmentationcited by 93
  37. 2022A high-resolution canopy height model of the Earthcited by 91
  38. 2019SESS: Self-Ensembling Semi-Supervised 3D Object Detectioncited by 89

50 most cited of 179 All 179 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.