mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

APCoTTA: Continual Test-Time Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation of Airborne LiDAR Point Clouds

arXiv 2505.09971 ↗First posted 15 May 2025cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Airborne laser scanning (ALS) point cloud semantic segmentation is a fundamental task for large-scale 3D scene understanding. Fixed models deployed in real-world scenarios often suffer from performance degradation due to continuous domain shifts caused by environmental and sensor changes. Continuous Test-Time Adaptation (CTTA) enables adaptation to evolving unlabeled domains, but its application to ALS point clouds remains underexplored, hindered by the lack of benchmarks and the risks of catastrophic forgetting and error accumulation. To address these challenges, we propose APCoTTA (ALS Point cloud Continuous Test-Time Adaptation), a novel CTTA framework tailored for ALS point cloud semantic segmentation. APCoTTA consists of three key components. First, we adapt a gradient-driven layer selection mechanism for ALS point clouds, selectively updating low-confidence layers while freezing stable ones to preserve source knowledge and mitigate catastrophic forgetting. Second, an entropy-based consistency loss discards unreliable samples and enforces consistency regularization solely on reliable ones, effectively reducing error accumulation and improving adaptation stability. Third, a random parameter interpolation mechanism stochastically blends adapted parameters with source model parameters, further balancing target adaptation and source knowledge retention. Finally, we construct two benchmarks, ISPRSC and H3DC, to address the lack of CTTA benchmarks for ALS point cloud segmentation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that APCoTTA achieves superior performance on both benchmarks, improving mIoU by approximately 9% and 14% over direct inference. The new benchmarks and code are available at https://github.com/Gaoyuan2/APCoTTA.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2025.

Builds on

36 of 59 references.

References · 36

  1. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  2. 2019KPConv: Flexible and Deformable Convolution for Point Cloudscited by 1,205
  3. 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 431
  4. 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 415
  5. 2021On the Importance of Gradients for Detecting Distributional Shifts in the Wildcited by 339
  6. 2019Benchmarking Robustness in Object Detection: Autonomous Driving when Winter is Comingcited by 336
  7. 2016Revisiting Batch Normalization For Practical Domain Adaptationcited by 288
  8. 2018SqueezeSegV2: Improved Model Structure and Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Road-Object Segmentation from a LiDAR Point Cloudcited by 228
  9. 2022Surgical Fine-Tuning Improves Adaptation to Distribution Shiftscited by 205
  10. 2023Robust Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Scenarioscited by 189
  11. 2023EcoTTA: Memory-Efficient Continual Test-time Adaptation via Self-distilled Regularizationcited by 123
  12. 2020Complete & Label: A Domain Adaptation Approach to Semantic Segmentation of LiDAR Point Cloudscited by 116
24 more
  1. 2023Benchmarking Robustness of 3D Object Detection to Common Corruptions in Autonomous Drivingcited by 114
  2. 2019Benchmarking the Robustness of Semantic Segmentation Modelscited by 111
  3. 2022Test-Time Adaptation via Conjugate Pseudo-labelscited by 98
  4. 2022Benchmarking and Analyzing Point Cloud Classification under Corruptionscited by 70
  5. 2022CoSMix: Compositional Semantic Mix for Domain Adaptation in 3D LiDAR Segmentationcited by 54
  6. 2021The Hessigheim 3D (H3D) Benchmark on Semantic Segmentation of High-Resolution 3D Point Clouds and Textured Meshes from UAV LiDAR and Multi-View-Stereocited by 37
  7. 2022GIPSO: Geometrically Informed Propagation for Online Adaptation in 3D LiDAR Segmentationcited by 35
  8. 2023Continual Test-time Domain Adaptation via Dynamic Sample Selectioncited by 35
  9. 2021AuxAdapt: Stable and Efficient Test-Time Adaptation for Temporally Consistent Video Semantic Segmentationcited by 31
  10. 2020LIBRE: The Multiple 3D LiDAR Datasetcited by 26
  11. 2022MATE: Masked Autoencoders are Online 3D Test-Time Learnerscited by 23
  12. 2023Point-TTA: Test-Time Adaptation for Point Cloud Registration Using Multitask Meta-Auxiliary Learningcited by 23
  13. 2021Unsupervised Domain Adaptation in LiDAR Semantic Segmentation with Self-Supervision and Gated Adapterscited by 21
  14. 2023Multi-Modal Continual Test-Time Adaptation for 3D Semantic Segmentationcited by 20
  15. 2023Benchmarking the Robustness of LiDAR Semantic Segmentation Modelscited by 18
  16. 2024CloudFixer: Test-Time Adaptation for 3D Point Clouds via Diffusion-Guided Geometric Transformationcited by 11
  17. 2024PCoTTA: Continual Test-Time Adaptation for Multi-Task Point Cloud Understandingcited by 11
  18. 2024Reshaping the Online Data Buffering and Organizing Mechanism for Continual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 9
  19. 2024Domain-Specific Block Selection and Paired-View Pseudo-Labeling for Online Test-Time Adaptationcited by 8
  20. 2024Test-time adaptation for geospatial point cloud semantic segmentation with distinct domain shiftscited by 8
  21. 2024Variational Continual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 7
  22. 2024MOS: Model Synergy for Test-Time Adaptation on LiDAR-Based 3D Object Detectioncited by 7
  23. 2025LiDAR Remote Sensing Meets Weak Supervision: Concepts, Methods, and Perspectivescited by 4
  24. 2020Curved Buildings Reconstruction from Airborne LiDAR Data by Matching and Deforming Geometric Primitivescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.