mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Self-Explaining Neural Networks for Business Process Monitoring

arXiv 2503.18067 ↗First posted 23 Mar 2025cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Tasks in Predictive Business Process Monitoring (PBPM), such as Next Activity Prediction, focus on generating useful business predictions from historical case logs. Recently, Deep Learning methods, particularly sequence-to-sequence models like Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), have become a dominant approach for tackling these tasks. However, to enhance model transparency, build trust in the predictions, and gain a deeper understanding of business processes, it is crucial to explain the decisions made by these models. Existing explainability methods for PBPM decisions are typically *post-hoc*, meaning they provide explanations only after the model has been trained. Unfortunately, these post-hoc approaches have shown to face various challenges, including lack of faithfulness, high computational costs and a significant sensitivity to out-of-distribution samples. In this work, we introduce, to the best of our knowledge, the first *self-explaining neural network* architecture for predictive process monitoring. Our framework trains an LSTM model that not only provides predictions but also outputs a concise explanation for each prediction, while adapting the optimization objective to improve the reliability of the explanation. We first demonstrate that incorporating explainability into the training process does not hurt model performance, and in some cases, actually improves it. Additionally, we show that our method outperforms post-hoc approaches in terms of both the faithfulness of the generated explanations and substantial improvements in efficiency.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2025.

Builds on

40 of 53 references.

References · 40

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,093
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,223
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,515
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,055
  5. 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 735
  6. 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
  7. 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 442
  8. 2020Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Netscited by 318
  9. 2019On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanationscited by 310
  10. 2019One Explanation Does Not Fit All: A Toolkit and Taxonomy of AI Explainability Techniquescited by 164
  11. 2018Abduction-Based Explanations for Machine Learning Modelscited by 160
  12. 2020Learning to Faithfully Rationalize by Constructioncited by 113
28 more
  1. 2016Predictive Business Process Monitoring with LSTM Neural Networkscited by 103
  2. 2020On The Reasons Behind Decisionscited by 100
  3. 2021The Out-of-Distribution Problem in Explainability and Search Methods for Feature Importance Explanationscited by 86
  4. 2020Model Interpretability through the Lens of Computational Complexitycited by 75
  5. 2016Predicting Process Behaviour using Deep Learningcited by 59
  6. 2021On Guaranteed Optimal Robust Explanations for NLP Modelscited by 54
  7. 2020On Explaining Decision Treescited by 49
  8. 2020Deep Learning for Predictive Business Process Monitoring: Review and Benchmarkcited by 45
  9. 2022Towards Formal XAI: Formally Approximate Minimal Explanations of Neural Networkscited by 42
  10. 2019Can I Trust the Explainer? Verifying Post-hoc Explanatory Methodscited by 37
  11. 2022On Computing Probabilistic Explanations for Decision Treescited by 35
  12. 2021A systematic literature review on state-of-the-art deep learning methods for process predictioncited by 32
  13. 2021Trading Complexity for Sparsity in Random Forest Explanationscited by 32
  14. 2018What made you do this? Understanding black-box decisions with sufficient input subsetscited by 31
  15. 2022VeriX: Towards Verified Explainability of Deep Neural Networkscited by 30
  16. 2020Explainable Predictive Process Monitoringcited by 27
  17. 2021The Role of Explainability in Assuring Safety of Machine Learning in Healthcarecited by 26
  18. 2016Time and Activity Sequence Prediction of Business Process Instancescited by 24
  19. 2023Formally Explaining Neural Networks within Reactive Systemscited by 24
  20. 2024Local vs. Global Interpretability: A Computational Complexity Perspectivecited by 23
  21. 2021Self-Interpretable Model with TransformationEquivariant Interpretationcited by 21
  22. 2023ProtoGate: Prototype-based Neural Networks with Global-to-local Feature Selection for Tabular Biomedical Datacited by 18
  23. 2021Explanations for Occluded Imagescited by 14
  24. 2021Embedding Graph Convolutional Networks in Recurrent Neural Networks for Predictive Monitoringcited by 12
  25. 2025Explain Yourself, Briefly! Self-Explaining Neural Networks with Concise Sufficient Reasonscited by 12
  26. 2025On the Computational Tractability of the (Many) Shapley Valuescited by 12
  27. 2024Hard to Explain: On the Computational Hardness of In-Distribution Model Interpretationcited by 11
  28. 2024On the Tractability of SHAP Explanations under Markovian Distributionscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.