On the Computational Tractability of the (Many) Shapley Values
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent studies have examined the computational complexity of computing Shapley additive explanations (also known as SHAP) across various models and distributions, revealing their tractability or intractability in different settings. However, these studies primarily focused on a specific variant called Conditional SHAP, though many other variants exist and address different limitations. In this work, we analyze the complexity of computing a much broader range of such variants, including Conditional, Interventional, and Baseline SHAP, while exploring both local and global computations. We show that both local and global Interventional and Baseline SHAP can be computed in polynomial time for various ML models under Hidden Markov Model distributions, extending popular algorithms such as TreeSHAP beyond empirical distributions. On the downside, we prove intractability results for these variants over a wide range of neural networks and tree ensembles. We believe that our results emphasize the intricate diversity of computing Shapley values, demonstrating how their complexity is substantially shaped by both the specific SHAP variant, the model type, and the distribution.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 8; 2026: 4.
12 papers.
- 2025Explaining, Fast and Slow: Abstraction and Refinement of Provable Explanationscited by 13
- 2026Formal Mechanistic Interpretability: Automated Circuit Discovery with Provable Guaranteescited by 10
- 2025Probabilistic Stability Guarantees for Feature Attributionscited by 9
- 2025SHAP Meets Tensor Networks: Provably Tractable Explanations with Parallelismcited by 8
- 2025Self-Explaining Neural Networks for Business Process Monitoringcited by 5
- 2025Additive Models Explained: A Computational Complexity Approachcited by 3
- 2025Feature Relevancy, Necessity and Usefulness: Complexity and Algorithmscited by 1
- 2025Uncovering Bugs in Formal Explainers: A Case Study with PyXAIcited by 1
- 2026Provably Explaining Neural Additive Modelscited by 1
- 2026Unifying Formal Explanations: A Complexity-Theoretic Perspectivecited by 1
- 2025Efficient & Correct Predictive Equivalence for Decision Treescited by 0
- 2026Verified SHAP: Provable Bounds for Exact Shapley Values of Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2026Verified SHAP: Provable Bounds for Exact Shapley Values of Neural Networks22 May 2026
- 2026Unifying Formal Explanations: A Complexity-Theoretic Perspective20 Feb 2026
- 2026Provably Explaining Neural Additive Models19 Feb 2026
- 2026Formal Mechanistic Interpretability: Automated Circuit Discovery with Provable Guarantees18 Feb 2026
- 2025Uncovering Bugs in Formal Explainers: A Case Study with PyXAI5 Nov 2025
- 2025SHAP Meets Tensor Networks: Provably Tractable Explanations with Parallelism24 Oct 2025
- 2025Additive Models Explained: A Computational Complexity Approach24 Oct 2025
- 2025Efficient & Correct Predictive Equivalence for Decision Trees22 Sep 2025
- 2025Explaining, Fast and Slow: Abstraction and Refinement of Provable Explanations10 Jun 2025
- 2025Feature Relevancy, Necessity and Usefulness: Complexity and Algorithms6 May 2025
- 2025Probabilistic Stability Guarantees for Feature Attributions18 Apr 2025
- 2025Self-Explaining Neural Networks for Business Process Monitoring23 Mar 2025