HonestCyberEval: An AI Cyber Risk Benchmark for Automated Software Exploitation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce HonestCyberEval, a new benchmark for assessing AI models' capabilities and risks in automated software exploitation, focusing on their ability to detect and exploit vulnerabilities in real-world software systems. Our evaluation leverages the Nginx web server repository augmented with synthetic vulnerabilities. We assess several leading language models, including OpenAI's GPT-4.5, o3-mini, o1 and o1-mini, Anthropic's Claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219, Claude-3.5-sonnet-20241022 and Claude-3.5-sonnet-20240620, Google DeepMind's Gemini-1.5-pro, and OpenAI's earlier GPT-4o model. Our findings reveal that these models vary significantly in their success rates and efficiency, with o1-preview achieving the highest success rate (92.85%) and o3-mini and Claude-3.7-sonnet-20250219 providing cost-effective but less successful alternatives. This risk evaluation establishes a foundation for systematically evaluating the AI cyber risk in realistic cyber offence operations.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2024.
Builds on
4 of 16 references.
References · 4
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
- 2024AgentHarm: A Benchmark for Measuring Harmfulness of LLM Agentscited by 406
- 2024Cybench: A Framework for Evaluating Cybersecurity Capabilities and Risks of Language Modelscited by 156
- 2024CyberSecEval 2: A Wide-Ranging Cybersecurity Evaluation Suite for Large Language Modelscited by 84
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.