mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Adaptive Preference Aggregation

arXiv 2503.10215 ↗First posted 13 Mar 2025cs.AI cs.GTcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

AI alignment, the challenge of ensuring AI systems act in accordance with human values, has emerged as a critical problem in the development of systems such as foundation models and recommender systems. Still, the current dominant approach, reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) faces known theoretical limitations in aggregating diverse human preferences. Social choice theory provides a framework to aggregate preferences, but was not developed for the multidimensional applications typical of AI. Leveraging insights from a recently published urn process, this work introduces a preference aggregation strategy that adapts to the user's context and that inherits the good properties of the maximal lottery, a Condorcet-consistent solution concept.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2025.

Builds on

17 of 41 references.

References · 17

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  3. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
  4. 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,184
  5. 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignmentcited by 1,055
  6. 2024A Minimaximalist Approach to Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 144
  7. 2023Distributional Preference Learning: Understanding and Accounting for Hidden Context in RLHFcited by 133
  8. 2015Contextual Dueling Banditscited by 101
  9. 2019Better Rewards Yield Better Summaries: Learning to Summarise Without Referencescited by 77
  10. 2018Fashionable Modelling with Fluxcited by 53
  11. 2024Axioms for AI Alignment from Human Feedbackcited by 52
  12. 2019α-Rank: Multi-Agent Evaluation by Evolutioncited by 51
5 more
  1. 2018Re-evaluating Evaluationcited by 47
  2. 2022JuMP 1.0: Recent improvements to a modeling language for mathematical optimizationcited by 37
  3. 2024Mapping Social Choice Theory to RLHFcited by 27
  4. 2025Jackpot! Alignment as a Maximal Lotterycited by 17
  5. 2023Modeling Recommender Ecosystems: Research Challenges at the Intersection of Mechanism Design, Reinforcement Learning and Generative Modelscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024MaxMin-RLHF: Alignment with Diverse Human Preferences
  2. 2024RLHF from Heterogeneous Feedback via Personalization and Preference Aggregation
  3. 2025Maximizing the efficiency of human feedback in AI alignment: a comparative analysis
  4. 2023AI Alignment and Social Choice: Fundamental Limitations and Policy Implications
  5. 2025Direct Preference Optimization with Unobserved Preference Heterogeneity: The Necessity of Ternary Preferences
  6. 2024Direct Preference Optimization With Unobserved Preference Heterogeneity: The Necessity of Ternary Preferences
  7. 2025Theoretical Tensions in RLHF: Reconciling Empirical Success with Inconsistencies in Social Choice Theory
  8. 2026AI Alignment From Social Choice Perspectives