mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Subverting Fair Image Search with Generative Adversarial Perturbations

arXiv 2205.02414 ↗First posted 5 May 2022cs.LG cs.CYcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work we explore the intersection fairness and robustness in the context of ranking: when a ranking model has been calibrated to achieve some definition of fairness, is it possible for an external adversary to make the ranking model behave unfairly without having access to the model or training data? To investigate this question, we present a case study in which we develop and then attack a state-of-the-art, fairness-aware image search engine using images that have been maliciously modified using a Generative Adversarial Perturbation (GAP) model. These perturbations attempt to cause the fair re-ranking algorithm to unfairly boost the rank of images containing people from an adversary-selected subpopulation. We present results from extensive experiments demonstrating that our attacks can successfully confer significant unfair advantage to people from the majority class relative to fairly-ranked baseline search results. We demonstrate that our attacks are robust across a number of variables, that they have close to zero impact on the relevance of search results, and that they succeed under a strict threat model. Our findings highlight the danger of deploying fair machine learning algorithms in-the-wild when (1) the data necessary to achieve fairness may be adversarially manipulated, and (2) the models themselves are not robust against attacks.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 64 of its 111 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2022.

Builds on

64 of 111 references.

References · 64

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  3. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  5. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  6. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  7. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
  8. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  9. 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,219
  10. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
  11. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  12. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
38 more
  1. 2020Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Taskscited by 1,213
  2. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
  3. 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 774
  4. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 638
  5. 2020On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example Defensescited by 547
  6. 2016Delving into Transferable Adversarial Examples and Black-box Attackscited by 530
  7. 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 514
  8. 2018Poison Frogs! Targeted Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 500
  9. 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 380
  10. 2018Adversarial Attack on Graph Structured Datacited by 300
  11. 2017Word Embeddings Quantify 100 Years of Gender and Ethnic Stereotypescited by 251
  12. 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
  13. 2018Fairness of Exposure in Rankingscited by 189
  14. 2019Fair Regression: Quantitative Definitions and Reduction-based Algorithmscited by 168
  15. 2017The Space of Transferable Adversarial Examplescited by 156
  16. 2019Making an Invisibility Cloak: Real World Adversarial Attacks on Object Detectorscited by 155
  17. 2017Generative Adversarial Perturbationscited by 153
  18. 2017A Convex Framework for Fair Regressioncited by 147
  19. 2017Fair Inference On Outcomescited by 143
  20. 2019Fairness-Aware Ranking in Search & Recommendation Systems with Application to LinkedIn Talent Searchcited by 137
  21. 2019Fairness in Recommendation Ranking through Pairwise Comparisonscited by 127
  22. 2016Technical Report on the CleverHans v2.1.0 Adversarial Examples Librarycited by 123
  23. 2017FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithmcited by 113
  24. 2021Understanding and Evaluating Racial Biases in Image Captioningcited by 108
  25. 2018Understanding the Origins of Bias in Word Embeddingscited by 90
  26. 2017Ranking with Fairness Constraintscited by 78
  27. 2020Subpopulation Data Poisoning Attackscited by 68
  28. 2020Controlling Fairness and Bias in Dynamic Learning-to-Rankcited by 67
  29. 2020Poisoning Attacks on Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 58
  30. 2020"What We Can't Measure, We Can't Understand": Challenges to Demographic Data Procurement in the Pursuit of Fairnesscited by 56
  31. 2020Fairness Through Robustness: Investigating Robustness Disparity in Deep Learningcited by 55
  32. 2018Causal Reasoning for Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 51
  33. 2019What's in a Name? Reducing Bias in Bios without Access to Protected Attributescited by 51
  34. 2017Defense against Universal Adversarial Perturbationscited by 48
  35. 2018Adversarial Personalized Ranking for Recommendationcited by 48
  36. 2020Exacerbating Algorithmic Bias through Fairness Attackscited by 47
  37. 2021Characterizing Intersectional Group Fairness with Worst-Case Comparisonscited by 42
  38. 2020On Adversarial Bias and the Robustness of Fair Machine Learningcited by 36

50 most cited of 64 All 64 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

5 papers.