mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Wikipedia in the Era of LLMs: Evolution and Risks

arXiv 2503.02879 ↗First posted 4 Mar 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.CYcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we present a comprehensive analysis and monitoring framework for the impact of Large Language Models (LLMs) on Wikipedia, examining the evolution of Wikipedia through existing data and using simulations to explore potential risks. We begin by analyzing article content and page views to study the recent changes in Wikipedia and assess the impact of LLMs. Subsequently, we evaluate how LLMs affect various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks related to Wikipedia, including machine translation and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). Our findings and simulation results reveal that Wikipedia articles have been affected by LLMs, with an impact of approximately 1% in certain categories. If the machine translation benchmark based on Wikipedia is influenced by LLMs, the scores of the models may become inflated, and the comparative results among models could shift. Moreover, the effectiveness of RAG might decrease if the knowledge has been contaminated by LLMs. While LLMs have not yet fully changed Wikipedia's language and knowledge structures, we believe that our empirical findings signal the need for careful consideration of potential future risks in NLP research. We release all the experimental dataset and source code at: https://github.com/HSM316/LLM_Wikipedia

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2025.

Builds on

46 of 75 references.

References · 46

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  4. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  5. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  6. 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,185
  7. 2020mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformercited by 1,813
  8. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
  9. 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,290
  10. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
  11. 2021The FLORES-101 Evaluation Benchmark for Low-Resource and Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 556
  12. 2024A Survey on RAG Meeting LLMs: Towards Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Modelscited by 450
34 more
  1. 2023The Curse of Recursion: Training on Generated Data Makes Models Forgetcited by 343
  2. 2024Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer Reviewscited by 160
  3. 2024Assisting in Writing Wikipedia-like Articles From Scratch with Large Language Modelscited by 150
  4. 2024Language agents achieve superhuman synthesis of scientific knowledgecited by 121
  5. 2023A Survey on LLM-Generated Text Detection: Necessity, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 101
  6. 2023WikiChat: Stopping the Hallucination of Large Language Model Chatbots by Few-Shot Grounding on Wikipediacited by 67
  7. 2024Do LLMs write like humans? Variation in grammatical and rhetorical stylescited by 62
  8. 2022Democratizing Neural Machine Translation with OPUS-MTcited by 57
  9. 2024LLM-as-a-Coauthor: Can Mixed Human-Written and Machine-Generated Text Be Detected?cited by 47
  10. 2024WikiContradict: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Real-World Knowledge Conflicts from Wikipediacited by 43
  11. 2024Is ChatGPT Transforming Academics' Writing Style?cited by 26
  12. 2024The Rise of AI-Generated Content in Wikipediacited by 22
  13. 2024The Impact of Large Language Models in Academia: from Writing to Speakingcited by 18
  14. 2024Exploring the Limitations of Detecting Machine-Generated Textcited by 15
  15. 2025Human-LLM Coevolution: Evidence from Academic Writingcited by 15
  16. 2025LLM as a Broken Telephone: Iterative Generation Distorts Informationcited by 12
  17. 2025GenAI Content Detection Task 1: English and Multilingual Machine-Generated Text Detection: AI vs. Humancited by 11
  18. 2014Wikipedia-based Semantic Interpretation for Natural Language Processingcited by 9
  19. 2024Seeing Like an AI: How LLMs Apply (and Misapply) Wikipedia Neutrality Normscited by 8
  20. 2024An Open Multilingual System for Scoring Readability of Wikipediacited by 7
  21. 2017Why We Read Wikipediacited by 6
  22. 2021On the Value of Wikipedia as a Gateway to the Webcited by 6
  23. 2024Wikimedia data for AI: a review of Wikimedia datasets for NLP tasks and AI-assisted editingcited by 6
  24. 2024Differentiating Between Human-Written and AI-Generated Texts Using Automatically Extracted Linguistic Featurescited by 5
  25. 2024Refining Wikidata Taxonomy using Large Language Modelscited by 5
  26. 2025Wikipedia Contributions in the Wake of ChatGPTcited by 5
  27. 2025Applying Text Mining to Analyze Human Question Asking in Creativity Researchcited by 3
  28. 2025REVERSUM: A Multi-staged Retrieval-Augmented Generation Method to Enhance Wikipedia Tail Biographies through Personal Narrativescited by 3
  29. 2023Curious Rhythms: Temporal Regularities of Wikipedia Consumptioncited by 2
  30. 2023Automatic Quality Assessment of Wikipedia Articles -- A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 2
  31. 2024WIKIGENBENCH: Exploring Full-length Wikipedia Generation under Real-World Scenariocited by 2
  32. 2024From Babbling to Fluency: Evaluating the Evolution of Language Models in Terms of Human Language Acquisitioncited by 2
  33. 2024Scholarly Wikidata: Population and Exploration of Conference Data in Wikidata using LLMscited by 2
  34. 2024Edisum: Summarizing and Explaining Wikipedia Edits at Scalecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Beyond Pipelines: A Fundamental Study on the Rise of Generative-Retrieval Architectures in Web Research
  2. 2025HoH: A Dynamic Benchmark for Evaluating the Impact of Outdated Information on Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  3. 2025When Retrieval Succeeds and Fails: Rethinking Retrieval-Augmented Generation for LLMs
  4. 2024On the Capacity of Citation Generation by Large Language Models
  5. 2024ClashEval: Quantifying the tug-of-war between an LLM's internal prior and external evidence
  6. 2024DomainRAG: A Chinese Benchmark for Evaluating Domain-specific Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  7. 2024Spiral of Silence: How is Large Language Model Killing Information Retrieval? -- A Case Study on Open Domain Question Answering
  8. 2025When Content is Goliath and Algorithm is David: The Style and Semantic Effects of Generative Search Engine