TSM-Bench: Detecting LLM-Generated Text in Real-World Wikipedia Editing Practices

Automatically detecting machine-generated text (MGT) is critical to maintaining the knowledge integrity of user-generated content (UGC) platforms such as Wikipedia. Existing detection benchmarks primarily focus on textitgeneric text generation tasks (e.g., ``Write an article about machine learning.''). However, editors frequently employ LLMs for specific writing tasks (e.g., summarisation). These textittask-specific MGT instances tend to resemble human-written text more closely due to their constrained task formulation and contextual conditioning. In this work, we show that a range of SOTA MGT detectors struggle to identify task-specific MGT reflecting real-world editing on Wikipedia. We introduce textscTSM-Bench, a multilingual, multi-generator, and textitmulti-task benchmark for evaluating MGT detectors on common, real-world Wikipedia editing tasks. Our findings demonstrate that (textiti) average detection accuracy drops by 10--40% compared to prior benchmarks, and (textitii) a generalisation asymmetry exists: fine-tuning on task-specific data enables generalisation to generic data -- even across domains -- but not vice versa. We demonstrate that models fine-tuned exclusively on generic MGT overfit to superficial artefacts of machine generation. Our results suggest that, in contrast to prior benchmarks, most detectors remain unreliable for automated detection in real-world contexts such as UGC platforms. textscTSM-Bench therefore provides a critical foundation for developing and evaluating future models.