mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AlignDistil: Token-Level Language Model Alignment as Adaptive Policy Distillation

arXiv 2503.02832 ↗First posted 4 Mar 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 15

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

In modern large language models (LLMs), LLM alignment is of crucial importance and is typically achieved through methods such as reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) and direct preference optimization (DPO). However, in most existing methods for LLM alignment, all tokens in the response are optimized using a sparse, response-level reward or preference annotation. The ignorance of token-level rewards may erroneously punish high-quality tokens or encourage low-quality tokens, resulting in suboptimal performance and slow convergence speed. To address this issue, we propose AlignDistil, an RLHF-equivalent distillation method for token-level reward optimization. Specifically, we introduce the reward learned by DPO into the RLHF objective and theoretically prove the equivalence between this objective and a token-level distillation process, where the teacher distribution linearly combines the logits from the DPO model and a reference model. On this basis, we further bridge the accuracy gap between the reward from the DPO model and the pure reward model, by building a contrastive DPO reward with a normal and a reverse DPO model. Moreover, to avoid under- and over-optimization on different tokens, we design a token adaptive logit extrapolation mechanism to construct an appropriate teacher distribution for each token. Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of our AlignDistil over existing methods and showcase fast convergence due to its token-level distributional reward optimization.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 33 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2025.

Builds on

33 of 48 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024TIS-DPO: Token-level Importance Sampling for Direct Preference Optimization With Estimated Weights6 Oct
  2. 2024Selective Preference Optimization via Token-Level Reward Function Estimation24 Aug
  3. 2024Bootstrapping Language Models with DPO Implicit Rewards14 Jun
  4. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward23 May
  5. 2024From r to Q^*: Your Language Model is Secretly a Q-Function18 Apr
  6. 2023Beyond Imitation: Leveraging Fine-grained Quality Signals for Alignment7 Nov
  7. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
  8. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 25

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  4. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  6. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  7. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  8. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
  9. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  10. 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,928
  11. 2020MiniLM: Deep Self-Attention Distillation for Task-Agnostic Compression of Pre-Trained Transformerscited by 1,414
  12. 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotationscited by 895
13 more
  1. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
  2. 2023On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakescited by 840
  3. 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 825
  4. 2016Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillationcited by 761
  5. 2024Improve Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models by Automated Process Supervisioncited by 426
  6. 2024Free Process Rewards without Process Labelscited by 162
  7. 2024DPO Meets PPO: Reinforced Token Optimization for RLHFcited by 126
  8. 2023f-Divergence Minimization for Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillationcited by 112
  9. 2024Dense Reward for Free in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 77
  10. 2024TLCR: Token-Level Continuous Reward for Fine-grained Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 43
  11. 2024Improving Large Language Models via Fine-grained Reinforcement Learning with Minimum Editing Constraintcited by 39
  12. 2024Reinforcement Learning with Token-level Feedback for Controllable Text Generationcited by 16
  13. 2024Inverse-Q*: Token Level Reinforcement Learning for Aligning Large Language Models Without Preference Datacited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 12.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025A Principled Loss Function for Direct Language Model Alignment
  2. 2025Towards Bridging the Reward-Generation Gap in Direct Alignment Algorithms
  3. 2025Aligning Frozen LLMs by Reinforcement Learning: An Iterative Reweight-then-Optimize Approach
  4. 2025RLHF in an SFT Way: From Optimal Solution to Reward-Weighted Alignment
  5. 2025Beyond RLHF: A Unified Theoretical Framework of Alignment
  6. 2024Towards Efficient Exact Optimization of Language Model Alignment
  7. 2024Unified Preference Optimization: Language Model Alignment Beyond the Preference Frontier
  8. 2024RS-DPO: A Hybrid Rejection Sampling and Direct Preference Optimization Method for Alignment of Large Language Models