mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FSPO: Few-Shot Optimization of Synthetic Preferences Personalizes to Real Users

arXiv 2502.19312 ↗First posted 26 Feb 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 15

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Human values and AI feedback alignment

Abstract (arXiv)

Effective personalization of LLMs is critical for a broad range of user-interfacing applications such as virtual assistants and content curation. Inspired by the strong in-context capabilities of LLMs, we propose few-shot preference optimization (FSPO), an algorithm for LLM personalization that reframes reward modeling as a meta-learning problem. Under FSPO, an LLM learns to quickly infer a personalized reward function for a user via a few labeled preferences. FSPO also utilizes user description rationalization (RAT) to encourage better reward modeling and instruction following, recovering performance with the oracle user description. Since real-world preference data is challenging to collect at scale, we propose careful design choices to construct synthetic preference datasets for personalization, generating over 1M synthetic personalized preferences using publicly available LLMs. To successfully transfer from synthetic data to real users, we find it crucial for the data to exhibit both high diversity and coherent, self-consistent structure. We evaluate FSPO on personalized open-ended generation for up to 1,500 synthetic users across three domains: movie reviews, education, and open-ended question answering. We also run a controlled human study. Overall, FSPO achieves an 87% Alpaca Eval winrate in generating responses that are personalized to synthetic users and a 70% winrate with real human users in open-ended question answering.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 36 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2025.

Builds on

36 of 53 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Test-Time Alignment via Hypothesis Reweighting11 Dec
  2. 2024Benchmarking Distributional Alignment of Large Language Models8 Nov
  3. 2024Aligning LLMs with Individual Preferences via Interaction4 Oct
  4. 2024PERSONA: A Reproducible Testbed for Pluralistic Alignment24 Jul
  5. 2024The PRISM Alignment Dataset: What Participatory, Representative and Individualised Human Feedback Reveals About the Subjective and Multicultural Alignment of Large Language Models24 Apr
  6. 2023Personalized Soups: Personalized Large Language Model Alignment via Post-hoc Parameter Merging17 Oct
  7. 2023AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedback22 May

Other references · 29

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  5. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
  6. 2021Isaac Gym: High Performance GPU-Based Physics Simulation For Robot Learningcited by 998
  7. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferencescited by 912
  8. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 897
  9. 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 759
  10. 2023MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language Modelscited by 735
  11. 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 681
  12. 2023Reinforced Self-Training (ReST) for Language Modelingcited by 500
17 more
  1. 2024Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Predictioncited by 480
  2. 2016Learning to reinforcement learncited by 377
  3. 2023UniSim: A Neural Closed-Loop Sensor Simulatorcited by 297
  4. 2023Marked Personas: Using Natural Language Prompts to Measure Stereotypes in Language Modelscited by 207
  5. 2024Rewards-in-Context: Multi-objective Alignment of Foundation Models with Dynamic Preference Adjustmentcited by 175
  6. 2021Meta-learning via Language Model In-context Tuningcited by 164
  7. 2024Personalizing Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Variational Preference Learningcited by 155
  8. 2023Distributional Preference Learning: Understanding and Accounting for Hidden Context in RLHFcited by 133
  9. 2021Sequence Parallelism: Long Sequence Training from System Perspectivecited by 126
  10. 2024Synthetic Data (Almost) from Scratch: Generalized Instruction Tuning for Language Modelscited by 99
  11. 2019Meta-Learning without Memorizationcited by 92
  12. 2018Unsupervised Learning via Meta-Learningcited by 82
  13. 2023Group Preference Optimization: Few-Shot Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 63
  14. 2016One-shot Learning with Memory-Augmented Neural Networkscited by 60
  15. 2017Domain Randomization and Generative Models for Robotic Graspingcited by 36
  16. 2024Distributional Preference Alignment of LLMs via Optimal Transportcited by 26
  17. 2024Context Parallelism for Scalable Million-Token Inferencecited by 26

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 9; 2026: 6.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024PersonalLLM: Tailoring LLMs to Individual Preferences
  2. 2026Personalizing LLMs with Binary Feedback: A Preference-Corrected Optimization Framework
  3. 2026Many Preferences, Few Policies: Towards Scalable Language Model Personalization
  4. 2026One Adapts to Any: Meta Reward Modeling for Personalized LLM Alignment
  5. 2024Orchestrating LLMs with Different Personalizations
  6. 2025Language Model Personalization via Reward Factorization
  7. 2025CoPL: Collaborative Preference Learning for Personalizing LLMs
  8. 2024ICPL: Few-shot In-context Preference Learning via LLMs