mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ICPL: Few-shot In-context Preference Learning via LLMs

arXiv 2410.17233 ↗First posted 22 Oct 2024cs.AI cs.LGcited by 7

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Preference-based reinforcement learning is an effective way to handle tasks where rewards are hard to specify but can be exceedingly inefficient as preference learning is often tabula rasa. We demonstrate that Large Language Models (LLMs) have native preference-learning capabilities that allow them to achieve sample-efficient preference learning, addressing this challenge. We propose In-Context Preference Learning (ICPL), which uses in-context learning capabilities of LLMs to reduce human query inefficiency. ICPL uses the task description and basic environment code to create sets of reward functions which are iteratively refined by placing human feedback over videos of the resultant policies into the context of an LLM and then requesting better rewards. We first demonstrate ICPL's effectiveness through a synthetic preference study, providing quantitative evidence that it significantly outperforms baseline preference-based methods with much higher performance and orders of magnitude greater efficiency. We observe that these improvements are not solely coming from LLM grounding in the task but that the quality of the rewards improves over time, indicating preference learning capabilities. Additionally, we perform a series of real human preference-learning trials and observe that ICPL extends beyond synthetic settings and can work effectively with humans-in-the-loop.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 22 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2024.

Builds on

22 of 34 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 21

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  3. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  4. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  5. 2023A Prompt Pattern Catalog to Enhance Prompt Engineering with ChatGPTcited by 612
  6. 2023Eureka: Human-Level Reward Design via Coding Large Language Modelscited by 542
  7. 2022VIP: Towards Universal Visual Reward and Representation via Value-Implicit Pre-Trainingcited by 384
  8. 2018Reward learning from human preferences and demonstrations in Ataricited by 314
  9. 2021PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-trainingcited by 298
  10. 2021Recursively Summarizing Books with Human Feedbackcited by 287
  11. 2023Reward Design with Language Modelscited by 257
  12. 2024PIVOT: Iterative Visual Prompting Elicits Actionable Knowledge for VLMscited by 187
9 more
  1. 2023Language-Driven Representation Learning for Roboticscited by 163
  2. 2023Vision-Language Models as Success Detectorscited by 138
  3. 2023Large Language Models as Evolutionary Optimizerscited by 122
  4. 2020Reward-rational (implicit) choice: A unifying formalism for reward learningcited by 119
  5. 2021B-Pref: Benchmarking Preference-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 106
  6. 2022SURF: Semi-supervised Reward Learning with Data Augmentation for Feedback-efficient Preference-based Reinforcement Learningcited by 96
  7. 2024DrEureka: Language Model Guided Sim-To-Real Transfercited by 78
  8. 2024Do LLM Agents Have Regret? A Case Study in Online Learning and Gamescited by 33
  9. 2024PREDILECT: Preferences Delineated with Zero-Shot Language-based Reasoning in Reinforcement Learningcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Using Context Is Not Enough: Test-Time Training for Personalized Reward Modeling
  2. 2025A Survey of Direct Preference Optimization
  3. 2024Preference Tuning with Human Feedback on Language, Speech, and Vision Tasks: A Survey
  4. 2025IPO: Your Language Model is Secretly a Preference Classifier
  5. 2024Improving Context-Aware Preference Modeling for Language Models
  6. 2024Self-supervised Preference Optimization: Enhance Your Language Model with Preference Degree Awareness
  7. 2026A Regret Minimization Framework on Preference Learning in Large Language Models
  8. 2025LoRe: Personalizing LLMs via Low-Rank Reward Modeling