mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Personalizing LLMs with Binary Feedback: A Preference-Corrected Optimization Framework

arXiv 2605.10043 ↗First posted 11 May 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Human values and AI feedback alignment

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Model (LLM) personalization aims to align model behaviors with individual user preferences. Existing methods often focus on isolated user histories, neglecting the essential role of inter-user differences. We propose C-BPO, a framework that personalizes LLMs via preference-calibrated binary signals. By treating target user data as positive feedback and other users' data as an auxiliary set of implicit negative signals, C-BPO captures distinct inter-user differences. To mitigate the preference overlap issue, where shared task knowledge is erroneously penalized, we derive an objective grounded in Positive-Unlabeled (PU) learning theory. This approach purifies negative signals by subtracting ``positive bias'', ensuring alignment with unique idiosyncrasies without compromising general helpfulness. Empirical experiments across various personalization tasks and backbone LLMs show C-BPO consistently outperforms baselines, demonstrating the efficacy of preference-calibrated binary signals in modeling inter-user differences.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 20 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.

Builds on

20 of 39 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Personalized LLM Decoding via Contrasting Personal Preference13 Jun
  2. 2025A Survey on Personalized Alignment -- The Missing Piece for Large Language Models in Real-World Applications21 Mar

Other references · 18

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  4. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  6. 2023LaMP: When Large Language Models Meet Personalizationcited by 425
  7. 2018Learning from positive and unlabeled data: a surveycited by 218
  8. 2017Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Non-Negative Risk Estimatorcited by 217
  9. 2024Two Tales of Persona in LLMs: A Survey of Role-Playing and Personalizationcited by 203
  10. 2025The Landscape of Agentic Reinforcement Learning for LLMs: A Surveycited by 195
  11. 2023Pearl: Personalizing Large Language Model Writing Assistants with Generation-Calibrated Retrieverscited by 91
  12. 2024Personalized Pieces: Efficient Personalized Large Language Models through Collaborative Effortscited by 71
6 more
  1. 2024Binary Classifier Optimization for Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 44
  2. 2025Retrieval Augmented Generation with Collaborative Filtering for Personalized Text Generationcited by 23
  3. 2025Latent Inter-User Difference Modeling for LLM Personalizationcited by 20
  4. 2025Multi-objective Large Language Model Alignment with Hierarchical Expertscited by 10
  5. 2026E3-TIR: Enhanced Experience Exploitation for Tool-Integrated Reasoningcited by 6
  6. 2026Backdoors in RLVR: Jailbreak Backdoors in LLMs From Verifiable Rewardcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024PersonalLLM: Tailoring LLMs to Individual Preferences
  2. 2025LoRe: Personalizing LLMs via Low-Rank Reward Modeling
  3. 2024Orchestrating LLMs with Different Personalizations
  4. 2026Many Preferences, Few Policies: Towards Scalable Language Model Personalization
  5. 2025CoPL: Collaborative Preference Learning for Personalizing LLMs
  6. 2025POPI: Personalizing LLMs via Optimized Natural Language Preference Inference
  7. 2025Personalize Your LLM: Fake it then Align it
  8. 2025FSPO: Few-Shot Optimization of Synthetic Preferences Personalizes to Real Users