Recon: Reconstruction-Guided Reasoning Synthesis for User Modeling
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
User modeling aims to use language models (LMs) to mimic an individual's behavior from a corpus of past context-action pairs (e.g., conversation turns), enabling the simulation of users in settings like behavioral science, human-AI collaboration, and market research. Recent approaches augment these corpora with synthesized reasoning traces, typically generated by conditioning on both context and action. However, such conditioning constitutes post-hoc rationalization rather than reasoning: the trace is guaranteed to justify the action, but may not encode the underlying latent causal decision paths. We propose Recon, which uses action reconstruction to score reasoning traces by their predictive power: given a context and candidate reasoning, a reconstruction model predicts the action, and reconstruction fidelity determines reasoning quality. Across four domains, Recon achieves a 54.7% win rate over Backward Synthesis, a standard post-hoc rationalization baseline. Further, we find that training a reasoning synthesis model with rewards derived from Recon improves downstream user modeling performance, achieving a win rate of up to 70.0% over baselines. We further show that Recon-synthesized reasoning transfers across models, and improves user modeling beyond the reconstruction model. Our work demonstrates that post-hoc rationalization is insufficient for reasoning synthesis, and that useful and interpretable reasoning should naturally elicit the action from the context.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 15 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2026.
Builds on
15 of 31 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Report14 May
Other references · 14
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2025OpenAI GPT-5 System Cardcited by 910
- 2023Personalized Soups: Personalized Large Language Model Alignment via Post-hoc Parameter Mergingcited by 271
- 2024LLM Agents Grounded in Self-Reports Enable General-Purpose Simulation of Individualscited by 235
- 2024Personalized Language Modeling from Personalized Human Feedbackcited by 124
- 2025CollabLLM: From Passive Responders to Active Collaboratorscited by 117
- 2025Flipping the Dialogue: Training and Evaluating User Language Modelscited by 50
- 2026HumanLM: Simulating Users with State Alignment Beats Response Imitationcited by 31
- 2025Can LLM Agents Simulate Multi-Turn Human Behavior? Evidence from Real Online Customer Behavior Datacited by 27
- 2026Aligning Language Models from User Interactionscited by 21
- 2025How to Train Your Advisor: Steering Black-Box LLMs with Advisor Modelscited by 20
- 2025FSPO: Few-Shot Optimization of Synthetic Preferences Personalizes to Real Userscited by 14
2 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023REFINER: Reasoning Feedback on Intermediate Representations
- 2026ReIn: Conversational Error Recovery with Reasoning Inception
- 2026RECON: Benchmarking Agent Memory for Compositional Reasoning over Long Contexts
- 2026ReCrit: Transition-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Scientific Critic Reasoning
- 2026Reflective Recovery: A Self-Supervised Method for Reasoning by Learning from Mistakes
- 2026TruthTensor: Evaluating LLMs through Human Imitation on Prediction Market under Drift and Holistic Reasoning
- 2025A Sober Look at Progress in Language Model Reasoning: Pitfalls and Paths to Reproducibility
- 2026Steering Recurrent Reasoners at Inference Time with Readout Feedback