Many Preferences, Few Policies: Towards Scalable Language Model Personalization
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Human values and AI feedback alignment
Abstract (arXiv)
Aligning large language models (LLMs) requires balancing competing objectives such as helpfulness, harmlessness, and conciseness. The appropriate balance varies across users and applications, yet training, evaluating, and deploying many policies across different reward weights is costly. We study how to identify a small portfolio of LLMs that preserves near-optimal performance across all reward weightings. We propose PALM (Portfolio of Aligned LLMs), an algorithm that combines a structured grid of weight vectors, a lazy search that optimizes policies only where needed, and pruning. Given target approximation tolerances, PALM returns a portfolio that provably contains a near-optimal policy for every weight vector, with an explicit upper bound on portfolio size. Such portfolios can support scalable personalization, reward-weight exploration during model development, and compact decoding-time configurations. Experiments show that PALM generally achieves smaller approximation gaps than same-size portfolios built from uniformly spaced or randomly sampled weights. We further demonstrate that PALM scales effectively to higher-dimensional reward spaces through efficient search and sparse preference structure.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 35 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2026.
Builds on
35 of 44 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2025LoRe: Personalizing LLMs via Low-Rank Reward Modeling20 Apr
- 2025From 1,000,000 Users to Every User: Scaling Up Personalized Preference for User-level Alignment19 Mar
- 2025Language Model Personalization via Reward Factorization8 Mar
Other references · 32
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 1,026
- 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 860
- 2023Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Trainingcited by 401
- 2024Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Expertscited by 376
- 2024Skywork-Reward: Bag of Tricks for Reward Modeling in LLMscited by 327
- 2021A Practical Guide to Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Planningcited by 256
- 2023Rewarded soups: towards Pareto-optimal alignment by interpolating weights fine-tuned on diverse rewardscited by 243
20 more
- 2019A Generalized Algorithm for Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Policy Adaptationcited by 177
- 2024Rewards-in-Context: Multi-objective Alignment of Foundation Models with Dynamic Preference Adjustmentcited by 175
- 2024Llumnix: Dynamic Scheduling for Large Language Model Servingcited by 174
- 2023HelpSteer: Multi-attribute Helpfulness Dataset for SteerLMcited by 142
- 2023Beyond One-Preference-Fits-All Alignment: Multi-Objective Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 124
- 2024Rule Based Rewards for Language Model Safetycited by 108
- 2024Decoding-Time Language Model Alignment with Multiple Objectivescited by 94
- 2023Sample-Efficient Multi-Objective Learning via Generalized Policy Improvement Prioritizationcited by 48
- 2024Conditional Language Policy: A General Framework for Steerable Multi-Objective Finetuningcited by 43
- 2024The Perfect Blend: Redefining RLHF with Mixture of Judgescited by 43
- 2025PARM: Multi-Objective Test-Time Alignment via Preference-Aware Autoregressive Reward Modelcited by 28
- 2025A Survey of Personalization: From RAG to Agentcited by 27
- 2025Robust Multi-Objective Preference Alignment with Online DPOcited by 22
- 2025Multi-objective Large Language Model Alignment with Hierarchical Expertscited by 13
- 2022Which Lp norm is the fairest? Approximations for fair facility location across all "p"cited by 9
- 2023Eliciting User Preferences for Personalized Multi-Objective Decision Making through Comparative Feedbackcited by 7
- 2025Simultaneous Multi-objective Alignment Across Verifiable and Non-verifiable Rewardscited by 6
- 2025Navigating the Social Welfare Frontier: Portfolios for Multi-objective Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
- 2023Balancing Notions of Equity: Trade-offs Between Fair Portfolio Sizes and Achievable Guaranteescited by 4
- 2024Data-Driven Solution Portfolioscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Personalize Your LLM: Fake it then Align it
- 2025POPI: Personalizing LLMs via Optimized Natural Language Preference Inference
- 2024Orchestrating LLMs with Different Personalizations
- 2026CLIPer: Tailoring Diverse User Preference via Classifier-Guided Inference-Time Personalization
- 2026Personalizing LLMs with Binary Feedback: A Preference-Corrected Optimization Framework
- 2025A Survey on Personalized and Pluralistic Preference Alignment in Large Language Models
- 2025FSPO: Few-Shot Optimization of Synthetic Preferences Personalizes to Real Users
- 2024PersonalLLM: Tailoring LLMs to Individual Preferences