ATEB: Evaluating and Improving Advanced NLP Tasks for Text Embedding Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Traditional text embedding benchmarks primarily evaluate embedding models' capabilities to capture semantic similarity. However, more advanced NLP tasks require a deeper understanding of text, such as safety and factuality. These tasks demand an ability to comprehend and process complex information, often involving the handling of sensitive content, or the verification of factual statements against reliable sources. We introduce a new benchmark designed to assess and highlight the limitations of embedding models trained on existing information retrieval data mixtures on advanced capabilities, which include factuality, safety, instruction following, reasoning and document-level understanding. This benchmark includes a diverse set of tasks that simulate real-world scenarios where these capabilities are critical and leads to identification of the gaps of the currently advanced embedding models. Furthermore, we propose a novel method that reformulates these various tasks as retrieval tasks. By framing tasks like safety or factuality classification as retrieval problems, we leverage the strengths of retrieval models in capturing semantic relationships while also pushing them to develop a deeper understanding of context and content. Using this approach with single-task fine-tuning, we achieved performance gains of 8% on factuality classification and 13% on safety classification. Our code and data will be publicly available.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2025.
Builds on
36 of 49 references.
References · 36
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,474
- 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,224
- 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
- 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,173
24 more
- 2021BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Modelscited by 1,252
- 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,184
- 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 860
- 2023AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedbackcited by 748
- 2024NV-Embed: Improved Techniques for Training LLMs as Generalist Embedding Modelscited by 472
- 2018e-SNLI: Natural Language Inference with Natural Language Explanationscited by 468
- 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defensecited by 429
- 2024LLM2Vec: Large Language Models Are Secretly Powerful Text Encoderscited by 404
- 2022Text and Code Embeddings by Contrastive Pre-Trainingcited by 361
- 2019Abductive Commonsense Reasoningcited by 301
- 2021Understanding Dataset Difficulty with V-Usable Informationcited by 291
- 2021Get Your Vitamin C! Robust Fact Verification with Contrastive Evidencecited by 225
- 2024BRIGHT: A Realistic and Challenging Benchmark for Reasoning-Intensive Retrievalcited by 158
- 2022On the Origin of Hallucinations in Conversational Models: Is it the Datasets or the Models?cited by 138
- 2022FaithDial: A Faithful Benchmark for Information-Seeking Dialoguecited by 109
- 2021DocNLI: A Large-scale Dataset for Document-level Natural Language Inferencecited by 75
- 2024Foundational Autoraters: Taming Large Language Models for Better Automatic Evaluationcited by 74
- 2023Benchmarking Generation and Evaluation Capabilities of Large Language Models for Instruction Controllable Summarizationcited by 69
- 2024FollowIR: Evaluating and Teaching Information Retrieval Models to Follow Instructionscited by 69
- 2021DialFact: A Benchmark for Fact-Checking in Dialoguecited by 62
- 2019Selective Attention for Context-aware Neural Machine Translationcited by 60
- 2024RAR-b: Reasoning as Retrieval Benchmarkcited by 36
- 2021GENIE: Toward Reproducible and Standardized Human Evaluation for Text Generationcited by 20
- 2024Transforming LLMs into Cross-modal and Cross-lingual Retrieval Systemscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2025Position: Text Embeddings Should Capture Implicit Semantics, Not Just Surface Meaningcited by 10
- 2026Unlocking Multimodal Document Intelligence: From Current Triumphs to Future Frontiers of Visual Document Retrievalcited by 8
- 2025Benchmarking Information Retrieval Models on Complex Retrieval Taskscited by 6
- 2026IGU-LoRA: Adaptive Rank Allocation via Integrated Gradients and Uncertainty-Aware Scoringcited by 6
- 2025Advancing AI Research Assistants with Expert-Involved Learningcited by 0
- 2026IGU-LoRA: Adaptive Rank Allocation via Integrated Gradients and Uncertainty-Aware Scoring14 Mar 2026
- 2026Unlocking Multimodal Document Intelligence: From Current Triumphs to Future Frontiers of Visual Document Retrieval23 Feb 2026
- 2025Benchmarking Information Retrieval Models on Complex Retrieval Tasks8 Sep 2025
- 2025Position: Text Embeddings Should Capture Implicit Semantics, Not Just Surface Meaning10 Jun 2025
- 2025Advancing AI Research Assistants with Expert-Involved Learning3 May 2025