Thinking Outside the (Gray) Box: A Context-Based Score for Assessing Value and Originality in Neural Text Generation
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite the increasing use of large language models for creative tasks, their outputs often lack diversity. Common solutions, such as sampling at higher temperatures, can compromise the quality of the results. Dealing with this trade-off is still an open challenge in designing AI systems for creativity. Drawing on information theory, we propose a context-based score to quantitatively evaluate value and originality. This score incentivizes accuracy and adherence to the request while fostering divergence from the learned distribution. We show that our score can be used as a reward in a reinforcement learning framework to fine-tune large language models for maximum performance. We validate our strategy through experiments considering a variety of creative tasks, such as poetry generation and math problem solving, demonstrating that it enhances the value and originality of the generated solutions.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 41 of its 100 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2025.
Builds on
41 of 100 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 40
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
- 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
28 more
- 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
- 2015A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Modelscited by 1,068
- 2023MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language Modelscited by 724
- 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 598
- 2023Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM Generalisation and Diversitycited by 386
- 2024Can LLMs Generate Novel Research Ideas? A Large-Scale Human Study with 100+ NLP Researcherscited by 348
- 2024Skywork-Reward: Bag of Tricks for Reward Modeling in LLMscited by 322
- 2022The Effects of Reward Misspecification: Mapping and Mitigating Misaligned Modelscited by 312
- 2019Benchmarking Zero-shot Text Classification: Datasets, Evaluation and Entailment Approachcited by 299
- 2023Generative artificial intelligence enhances creativity but reduces the diversity of novel contentcited by 165
- 2024Turning Up the Heat: Min-p Sampling for Creative and Coherent LLM Outputscited by 148
- 2024Is Temperature the Creativity Parameter of Large Language Models?cited by 92
- 2017Surprise-Based Intrinsic Motivation for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 83
- 2024Curiosity-driven Red-teaming for Large Language Modelscited by 83
- 2022Putting GPT-3's Creativity to the (Alternative Uses) Testcited by 62
- 2023On the Creativity of Large Language Modelscited by 57
- 2024Standardizing the Measurement of Text Diversity: A Tool and a Comparative Analysis of Scorescited by 50
- 2023Quality-Diversity through AI Feedbackcited by 40
- 2024AI as Humanity's Salieri: Quantifying Linguistic Creativity of Language Models via Systematic Attribution of Machine Text against Web Textcited by 40
- 2022Rethinking and Refining the Distinct Metriccited by 27
- 2021Curiosity-Driven Exploration via Latent Bayesian Surprisecited by 22
- 2021Creativity and Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 21
- 2023Beyond Prompts: Exploring the Design Space of Mixed-Initiative Co-Creativity Systemscited by 20
- 2015Data Generation as Sequential Decision Makingcited by 15
- 2025Curiosity-Driven Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 14
- 2023Bits of Grass: Does GPT already know how to write like Whitman?cited by 13
- 2023Reinforcement Learning for Generative AI: State of the Art, Opportunities and Open Research Challengescited by 10
- 2023Quality Diversity through Human Feedback: Towards Open-Ended Diversity-Driven Optimizationcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026UniCreative: Unifying Long-form Logic and Short-form Sparkle via Reference-Free Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Igniting Creative Writing in Small Language Models: LLM-as-a-Judge versus Multi-Agent Refined Rewards
- 2025E.A.R.T.H.: Structuring Creative Evolution through Model Error in Generative AI
- 2026Rewarding Creativity: A Human-Aligned Generative Reward Model for Reinforcement Learning in Storytelling
- 2025Training Emergent Joint Associations: A Reinforcement Learning Approach to Creative Thinking in Language Models
- 2025AI-Slop to AI-Polish? Aligning Language Models through Edit-Based Writing Rewards and Test-time Computation
- 2024Creativity Has Left the Chat: The Price of Debiasing Language Models
- 2026"I've Seen How This Goes": Characterizing Diversity via Progressive Conditional Surprise