Rewarding Creativity: A Human-Aligned Generative Reward Model for Reinforcement Learning in Storytelling
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Human values and AI feedback alignment
Abstract (arXiv)
While Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate fluent text, producing high-quality creative stories remains challenging. Reinforcement Learning (RL) offers a promising solution but faces two critical obstacles: designing reliable reward signals for subjective storytelling quality and mitigating training instability. This paper introduces the Reinforcement Learning for Creative Storytelling (RLCS) framework to systematically address both challenges. First, we develop a Generative Reward Model (GenRM) that provides multi-dimensional analysis and explicit reasoning about story preferences, trained through supervised fine-tuning on demonstrations with reasoning chains distilled from strong teacher models, followed by GRPO-based refinement on expanded preference data. Second, we introduce an entropy-based reward shaping strategy that dynamically prioritizes learning on confident errors and uncertain correct predictions, preventing overfitting on already-mastered patterns. Experiments demonstrate that GenRM achieves 68% alignment with human creativity judgments, and RLCS significantly outperforms strong baselines including Gemini-2.5-Pro in overall story quality. This work provides a practical pipeline for applying RL to creative domains, effectively navigating the dual challenges of reward modeling and training stability.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 26 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jan 2026.
Builds on
26 of 36 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 25
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
- 2024Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Predictioncited by 480
- 2025Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domainscited by 366
- 2024Meta-Rewarding Language Models: Self-Improving Alignment with LLM-as-a-Meta-Judgecited by 204
- 2024Advancing LLM Reasoning Generalists with Preference Treescited by 192
- 2023Art or Artifice? Large Language Models and the False Promise of Creativitycited by 172
- 2025RM-R1: Reward Modeling as Reasoningcited by 154
- 2025Reinforcement Learning with Rubric Anchorscited by 113
13 more
- 2025Big-Math: A Large-Scale, High-Quality Math Dataset for Reinforcement Learning in Language Modelscited by 109
- 2025Critique-GRPO: Advancing LLM Reasoning with Natural Language and Numerical Feedbackcited by 90
- 2022Same Author or Just Same Topic? Towards Content-Independent Style Representationscited by 86
- 2023The Next Chapter: A Study of Large Language Models in Storytellingcited by 58
- 2025Writing-Zero: Bridge the Gap Between Non-verifiable Tasks and Verifiable Rewardscited by 50
- 2024Can AI writing be salvaged? Mitigating Idiosyncrasies and Improving Human-AI Alignment in the Writing Process through Editscited by 49
- 2024CompassJudger-1: All-in-one Judge Model Helps Model Evaluation and Evolutioncited by 42
- 2024Do Language Models Enjoy Their Own Stories? Prompting Large Language Models for Automatic Story Evaluationcited by 32
- 2022StoryER: Automatic Story Evaluation via Ranking, Rating and Reasoningcited by 21
- 2025Adaptive Social Learning via Mode Policy Optimization for Language Agentscited by 15
- 2025R1-Code-Interpreter: LLMs Reason with Code via Supervised and Multi-stage Reinforcement Learningcited by 15
- 2025When Judgment Becomes Noise: How Design Failures in LLM Judge Benchmarks Silently Undermine Validitycited by 11
- 2025The Reader is the Metric: How Textual Features and Reader Profiles Explain Conflicting Evaluations of AI Creative Writingcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2022Robust Preference Learning for Storytelling via Contrastive Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Generating Constructive Feedback on Stories via Reinforcement Learning
- 2026CreativeInstruct: Scalably Teaching LLMs to Balance Quality, Creativity, and Diversity
- 2025Training Emergent Joint Associations: A Reinforcement Learning Approach to Creative Thinking in Language Models
- 2026Retell, Reward, Repeat: Reinforcement Learning for Narrative Theory-Informed Story Retelling
- 2026Playing with Words, Improving with Rewards: Training Language Models for Creative Association
- 2026UniCreative: Unifying Long-form Logic and Short-form Sparkle via Reference-Free Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Creative Preference Optimization