mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Aligning Large Language Models to Follow Instructions and Hallucinate Less via Effective Data Filtering

arXiv 2502.07340 ↗First posted 11 Feb 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 12

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Training LLMs on data containing unfamiliar knowledge during the instruction tuning stage can encourage hallucinations. To address this challenge, we introduce NOVA, a novel framework designed to identify high-quality data that aligns well with the LLM's learned knowledge to reduce hallucinations. NOVA includes Internal Consistency Probing (ICP) and Semantic Equivalence Identification (SEI) to measure how familiar the LLM is with instruction data. Specifically, ICP evaluates the LLM's understanding of the given instruction by calculating the tailored consistency among multiple self-generated responses. SEI further assesses the familiarity of the LLM with the target response by comparing it to the generated responses, using the proposed semantic clustering and well-designed voting strategy. Finally, to ensure the quality of selected samples, we introduce an expert-aligned reward model, considering characteristics beyond just familiarity. By considering data quality and avoiding unfamiliar data, we can utilize the selected data to effectively align LLMs to follow instructions and hallucinate less.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 30 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2025.

Builds on

30 of 50 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Unfamiliar Finetuning Examples Control How Language Models Hallucinate8 Mar
  2. 2024Self-Alignment for Factuality: Mitigating Hallucinations in LLMs via Self-Evaluation14 Feb
  3. 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuning25 Dec
  4. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignment18 May
  5. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions20 Dec
  6. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 24

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  5. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  6. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  7. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
  8. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
  9. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
  10. 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,259
  11. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 514
  12. 2023How Far Can Camels Go? Exploring the State of Instruction Tuning on Open Resourcescited by 405
12 more
  1. 2023A Survey of Hallucination in Large Foundation Modelscited by 365
  2. 2024INSIDE: LLMs' Internal States Retain the Power of Hallucination Detectioncited by 317
  3. 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 301
  4. 2024Does Fine-Tuning LLMs on New Knowledge Encourage Hallucinations?cited by 227
  5. 2023Fine-tuning Language Models for Factualitycited by 219
  6. 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection and Selective Generation for Conditional Language Modelscited by 193
  7. 2023SpokenWOZ: A Large-Scale Speech-Text Benchmark for Spoken Task-Oriented Dialogue Agentscited by 71
  8. 2024Clustering and Ranking: Diversity-preserved Instruction Selection through Expert-aligned Quality Estimationcited by 53
  9. 2023Impossible Distillation: from Low-Quality Model to High-Quality Dataset & Model for Summarization and Paraphrasingcited by 31
  10. 2023CoachLM: Automatic Instruction Revisions Improve the Data Quality in LLM Instruction Tuningcited by 19
  11. 2024RECOST: External Knowledge Guided Data-efficient Instruction Tuningcited by 18
  12. 2024Integrative Decoding: Improve Factuality via Implicit Self-consistencycited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 6.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Rowen: Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Hallucination Mitigation in LLMs
  2. 2026Evaluating Hallucinations in Domain-Adapted Large Language Models
  3. 2024Prescribing the Right Remedy: Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models via Targeted Instruction Tuning
  4. 2025Triggering Hallucinations in LLMs: A Quantitative Study of Prompt-Induced Hallucination in Large Language Models
  5. 2024The HalluRAG Dataset: Detecting Closed-Domain Hallucinations in RAG Applications Using an LLM's Internal States
  6. 2025CCL-XCoT: An Efficient Cross-Lingual Knowledge Transfer Method for Mitigating Hallucination Generation
  7. 2025Improving the Reliability of LLMs: Combining CoT, RAG, Self-Consistency, and Self-Verification
  8. 2024Investigating the Role of Prompting and External Tools in Hallucination Rates of Large Language Models