mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Revisiting Online Learning Approach to Inverse Linear Optimization: A Fenchel-Young Loss Perspective and Gap-Dependent Regret Analysis

arXiv 2501.13648 ↗First posted 23 Jan 2025cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper revisits the online learning approach to inverse linear optimization studied by B"armann et al. (2017), where the goal is to infer an unknown linear objective function of an agent from sequential observations of the agent's input-output pairs. First, we provide a simple understanding of the online learning approach through its connection to online convex optimization of Fenchel--Young losses. As a byproduct, we present an offline guarantee on the suboptimality loss, which measures how well predicted objectives explain the agent's choices, without assuming the optimality of the agent's choices. Second, assuming that there is a gap between optimal and suboptimal objective values in the agent's decision problems, we obtain an upper bound independent of the time horizon T on the sum of suboptimality and estimate losses, where the latter measures the quality of solutions recommended by predicted objectives. Interestingly, our gap-dependent analysis achieves a faster rate than the standard O(√T) regret bound by exploiting structures specific to inverse linear optimization, even though neither the loss functions nor their domains enjoy desirable properties, such as strong convexity.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2025.

Builds on

20 of 36 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Smart "Predict, then Optimize"cited by 339
  2. 2018Melding the Data-Decisions Pipeline: Decision-Focused Learning for Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 227
  3. 2018Tsallis-INF: An Optimal Algorithm for Stochastic and Adversarial Banditscited by 124
  4. 2019Learning with Fenchel-Young Lossescited by 119
  5. 2014A Second-order Bound with Excess Lossescited by 95
  6. 2021Inverse Optimization: Theory and Applicationscited by 48
  7. 2021Alternative Microfoundations for Strategic Classificationcited by 47
  8. 2020Fast Rates for Contextual Linear Optimizationcited by 43
  9. 2015Data-driven Inverse Optimization with Imperfect Informationcited by 34
  10. 2018An explicit analysis of the entropic penalty in linear programmingcited by 24
  11. 2021Contextual Inverse Optimization: Offline and Online Learningcited by 20
  12. 2018An Online-Learning Approach to Inverse Optimizationcited by 18
8 more
  1. 2020Learning Linear Programs from Optimal Decisionscited by 18
  2. 2015Inverse Optimization: Closed-form Solutions, Geometry and Goodness of fitcited by 13
  3. 2023Maximum Optimality Margin: A Unified Approach for Contextual Linear Programming and Inverse Linear Programmingcited by 13
  4. 2018Generalized Inverse Optimization through Online Learningcited by 12
  5. 2020Online Convex Optimization Perspective for Learning from Dynamically Revealed Preferencescited by 7
  6. 2024Online Structured Prediction with Fenchel--Young Losses and Improved Surrogate Regret for Online Multiclass Classification with Logistic Losscited by 7
  7. 2024From Inverse Optimization to Feasibility to ERMcited by 3
  8. 2024Learning with Fitzpatrick Lossescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 6.

8 papers.