Tight Regret Bound for Online Inverse Linear Optimization via Multiscale Matrix Weights
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study online inverse linear optimization with a fixed unknown linear utility: in each round, an environment presents a compact action set, the learner recommends an action from it, and the environment returns an action that maximizes the utility over the same set. When the utility vector and the actions lie in the d-dimensional Euclidean unit ball, we give a randomized algorithm whose regret---the cumulative utility shortfall relative to optimal actions---is O(√ d) in expectation for every time horizon, without knowledge of the horizon. The dependence on d is optimal up to a constant factor by the known Omega(√ d) lower bound for horizons T≥ d. Our algorithm maintains matrix multiplicative weights on polynomial feature spaces at geometrically spaced scales. It selects a recommendation distribution by solving a linear program and updates its score matrices by comparing the available actions with the feedback action. With rational oracle outputs and feedback actions, an implementation computable relative to a linear-optimization oracle preserves the O(√ d) regret bound. Whether the same rate is attainable with running time polynomial in the dimension, horizon, and input length remains open.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2026.
Builds on
20 of 31 references.
References · 20
- 2021Inverse Optimization: Theory and Applicationscited by 48
- 2015Inverse Optimization with Noisy Datacited by 34
- 2015Data-driven Inverse Optimization with Imperfect Informationcited by 34
- 2013Data-Driven Estimation in Equilibrium Using Inverse Optimizationcited by 32
- 2016Multidimensional Binary Search for Contextual Decision-Makingcited by 27
- 2018Contextual Search via Intrinsic Volumescited by 26
- 2021Contextual Inverse Optimization: Offline and Online Learningcited by 20
- 2018An Online-Learning Approach to Inverse Optimizationcited by 18
- 2021Contextual Recommendations and Low-Regret Cutting-Plane Algorithmscited by 15
- 2023Learning in Inverse Optimization: Incenter Cost, Augmented Suboptimality Loss, and Algorithmscited by 10
- 2025Online Inverse Linear Optimization: Efficient Logarithmic-Regret Algorithm, Robustness to Suboptimality, and Lower Boundcited by 9
- 2025Revisiting Online Learning Approach to Inverse Linear Optimization: A Fenchel-Young Loss Perspective and Gap-Dependent Regret Analysiscited by 8
8 more
- 2025Inverse Optimization via Learning Feasible Regionscited by 8
- 2026Finite and Corruption-Robust Regret Bounds in Online Inverse Linear Optimization under M-Convex Action Setscited by 8
- 2026Simple Projection-Free Algorithm for Contextual Recommendation with Logarithmic Regret and Robustnesscited by 6
- 2026Tight Generalization Bounds for Noiseless Inverse Optimizationcited by 6
- 2026Multiscale Reward Hedging from Correct Demonstrationscited by 5
- 2025Offline Reinforcement Learning via Inverse Optimizationcited by 3
- 2026Efficient Online Inverse Optimization with O(d) Regretcited by 3
- 2026Online Inverse Integer Linear Optimization via Small-Gradient Skipping: Constant Regret and Finite Mistakescited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
- 2026Optimal and Efficient Online Inverse Optimization6 Oct 2026
- 2026Cogentic: Multi-Agent Orchestration for Automated Proof Discovery30 Sep 2026