mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Online Inverse Integer Linear Optimization via Small-Gradient Skipping: Constant Regret and Finite Mistakes

arXiv 2609.09809 ↗First posted 9 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.DS math.OCcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In online inverse linear optimization, the learner predicts a weight at each round, observes the optimal action of the agent, and updates its prediction. In the general setting, the gap of log T between the regret upper bound O(d log T) and the lower bound Omega(d) is unresolved (here T is the total number of rounds and d is the dimension). When the action set is M-convex, the regret is known to be bounded by O(d log d), but the method attaining it computes a center of gravity at every round. This paper therefore proposes Small-Gradient Skipping (SGS), a mechanism that skips the update at rounds without a mistake, and applies it to online gradient descent, the online Newton step, and MetaGrad. When the forward problem is an integer linear program with a unique optimal solution, the number of mistakes is bounded, for all three, by a quantity independent of T; and for the online Newton step and for MetaGrad with SGS, the dimension dependence of the regret becomes O(d2), that is, the factor log T is removed. Moreover, when the action set is M-convex, the regret is bounded efficiently without computing a center of gravity.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2026.

Builds on

11 of 34 references.

References · 11

  1. 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 803
  2. 2019Online Learning: A Modern Introduction Using Convex Optimizationcited by 417
  3. 2018An Online-Learning Approach to Inverse Optimizationcited by 18
  4. 2025Online Inverse Linear Optimization: Efficient Logarithmic-Regret Algorithm, Robustness to Suboptimality, and Lower Boundcited by 9
  5. 2025Revisiting Online Learning Approach to Inverse Linear Optimization: A Fenchel-Young Loss Perspective and Gap-Dependent Regret Analysiscited by 8
  6. 2026Finite and Corruption-Robust Regret Bounds in Online Inverse Linear Optimization under M-Convex Action Setscited by 8
  7. 2026Simple Projection-Free Algorithm for Contextual Recommendation with Logarithmic Regret and Robustnesscited by 6
  8. 2026Tight Generalization Bounds for Noiseless Inverse Optimizationcited by 6
  9. 2026Multiscale Reward Hedging from Correct Demonstrationscited by 5
  10. 2024Exact Solution to Data-Driven Inverse Optimization of MILPs in Finite Time via Gradient-Based Methodscited by 4
  11. 2026Explicit Iteration Complexity of Exact Data-Driven Inverse Optimization for Integer Linear Programscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.