mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An explicit analysis of the entropic penalty in linear programming

arXiv 1806.01879 ↗First posted 5 Jun 2018math.OC cs.LG stat.MLcited by 23

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Solving linear programs by using entropic penalization has recently attracted new interest in the optimization community, since this strategy forms the basis for the fastest-known algorithms for the optimal transport problem, with many applications in modern large-scale machine learning. Crucial to these applications has been an analysis of how quickly solutions to the penalized program approach true optima to the original linear program. More than 20 years ago, Cominetti and San Mart'in showed that this convergence is exponentially fast; however, their proof is asymptotic and does not give any indication of how accurately the entropic program approximates the original program for any particular choice of the penalization parameter. We close this long-standing gap in the literature regarding entropic penalization by giving a new proof of the exponential convergence, valid for any linear program. Our proof is non-asymptotic, yields explicit constants, and has the virtue of being extremely simple. We provide matching lower bounds and show that the entropic approach does not lead to a near-linear time approximation scheme for the linear assignment problem.

Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 5; 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

23 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Differentiable Particle Filtering via Entropy-Regularized Optimal Transportcited by 59
  2. 2021Semi-Discrete Optimal Transport: Hardness, Regularization and Numerical Solutioncited by 13
  3. 2022Geometry and convergence of natural policy gradient methodscited by 12
  4. 2022Convergence Rates for Regularized Optimal Transport via Quantizationcited by 11
  5. 2021Complementary Composite Minimization, Small Gradients in General Norms, and Applicationscited by 9
  6. 2023Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Policy Evaluation and Learning for Contextual Banditscited by 9
  7. 2024Accelerating Sinkhorn Algorithm with Sparse Newton Iterationscited by 9
  8. 2025Revisiting Online Learning Approach to Inverse Linear Optimization: A Fenchel-Young Loss Perspective and Gap-Dependent Regret Analysiscited by 7
  9. 2023Efficient and Accurate Optimal Transport with Mirror Descent and Conjugate Gradientscited by 6
  10. 2024Annealed Sinkhorn for Optimal Transport: convergence, regularization path and debiasingcited by 6
  11. 2021Nearly Tight Convergence Bounds for Semi-discrete Entropic Optimal Transportcited by 5
  12. 2024Fisher-Rao Gradient Flows of Linear Programs and State-Action Natural Policy Gradientscited by 5
11 more
  1. 2025PINS: Proximal Iterations with Sparse Newton and Sinkhorn for Optimal Transportcited by 5
  2. 2024A Sinkhorn-type Algorithm for Constrained Optimal Transportcited by 3
  3. 2026Which Nash Equilibrium? Solver-Dependent Selection on Zero-Sum Nash Polytopescited by 2
  4. 2022Toric Geometry of Entropic Regularizationcited by 1
  5. 2024Sinkhorn Algorithm for Sequentially Composed Optimal Transportscited by 1
  6. 2023Convergence rate of Tsallis entropic regularized optimal transportcited by 0
  7. 2025Scalable Approximate Algorithms for Optimal Transport Linear Modelscited by 0
  8. 2025Entropic Mirror Descent for Linear Systems: Polyak's Stepsize and Implicit Biascited by 0
  9. 2026Avoiding Premature Collapse: Adaptive Annealing for Entropy-Regularized Structural Inferencecited by 0
  10. 2026Sinkhorn Linearization and the Spectral Proxy: Unifying the Statistical and Algorithmic Theory of Feature-Parameterized Inverse Optimal Transport via a Single Spectral Sandwichcited by 0
  11. 2026Support Topology and Gradient Mixing in Sinkhorn Layerscited by 0