mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Inverse Optimization: Closed-form Solutions, Geometry and Goodness of fit

arXiv 1511.04650 ↗First posted 15 Nov 2015math.OCcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In classical inverse linear optimization, one assumes a given solution is a candidate to be optimal. Real data is imperfect and noisy, so there is no guarantee this assumption is satisfied. Inspired by regression, this paper presents a unified framework for cost function estimation in linear optimization comprising a general inverse optimization model and a corresponding goodness-of-fit metric. Although our inverse optimization model is nonconvex, we derive a closed-form solution and present the geometric intuition. Our goodness-of-fit metric, ρ, the coefficient of complementarity, has similar properties to R2 from regression and is quasiconvex in the input data, leading to an intuitive geometric interpretation. While ρ is computable in polynomial-time, we derive a lower bound that possesses the same properties, is tight for several important model variations, and is even easier to compute. We demonstrate the application of our framework for model estimation and evaluation in production planning and cancer therapy.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2015.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort: