mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Any-stepsize Gradient Descent for Separable Data under Fenchel-Young Losses

arXiv 2502.04889 ↗First posted 7 Feb 2025stat.ML cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The gradient descent (GD) has been one of the most common optimizer in machine learning. In particular, the loss landscape of a neural network is typically sharpened during the initial phase of training, making the training dynamics hover on the edge of stability. This is beyond our standard understanding of GD convergence in the stable regime where arbitrarily chosen stepsize is sufficiently smaller than the edge of stability. Recently, Wu et al. (COLT2024) have showed that GD converges with arbitrary stepsize under linearly separable logistic regression. Although their analysis hinges on the self-bounding property of the logistic loss, which seems to be a cornerstone to establish a modified descent lemma, our pilot study shows that other loss functions without the self-bounding property can make GD converge with arbitrary stepsize. To further understand what property of a loss function matters in GD, we aim to show arbitrary-stepsize GD convergence for a general loss function based on the framework of Fenchel--Young losses. We essentially leverage the classical perceptron argument to derive the convergence rate for achieving ε-optimal loss, which is possible for a majority of Fenchel--Young losses. Among typical loss functions, the Tsallis entropy achieves the GD convergence rate T=Omega(ε-1/2), and the R'enyi entropy achieves the far better rate T=Omega(ε-1/3). We argue that these better rate is possible because of separation margin of loss functions, instead of the self-bounding property.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2025.

Builds on

37 of 70 references.

References · 37

  1. 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 649
  2. 2021Gradient Descent on Neural Networks Typically Occurs at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 413
  3. 2016From Softmax to Sparsemax: A Sparse Model of Attention and Multi-Label Classificationcited by 337
  4. 2022Mitigating Neural Network Overconfidence with Logit Normalizationcited by 251
  5. 2020The large learning rate phase of deep learning: the catapult mechanismcited by 206
  6. 2023Cross-Entropy Loss Functions: Theoretical Analysis and Applicationscited by 206
  7. 2019Sparse Sequence-to-Sequence Modelscited by 167
  8. 2022Self-Stabilization: The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 151
  9. 2022Understanding Gradient Descent on Edge of Stability in Deep Learningcited by 126
  10. 2019Learning with Fenchel-Young Lossescited by 117
  11. 2018Hessian-based Analysis of Large Batch Training and Robustness to Adversariescited by 87
  12. 2022Understanding the Generalization Benefit of Normalization Layers: Sharpness Reductioncited by 86
25 more
  1. 2022Understanding the unstable convergence of gradient descentcited by 84
  2. 2018A Walk with SGDcited by 74
  3. 2018SparseMAP: Differentiable Sparse Structured Inferencecited by 62
  4. 2019Normalized Flat Minima: Exploring Scale Invariant Definition of Flat Minima for Neural Networks using PAC-Bayesian Analysiscited by 58
  5. 2020Gradient descent follows the regularization path for general lossescited by 57
  6. 2022Understanding Edge-of-Stability Training Dynamics with a Minimalist Examplecited by 54
  7. 2022Learning threshold neurons via the "edge of stability"cited by 50
  8. 2021Large Learning Rate Tames Homogeneity: Convergence and Balancing Effectcited by 48
  9. 2022Beyond the Quadratic Approximation: the Multiscale Structure of Neural Network Loss Landscapescited by 42
  10. 2023Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Logistic Regression at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 42
  11. 2022Beyond the Edge of Stability via Two-step Gradient Updatescited by 38
  12. 2024Large Stepsize Gradient Descent for Logistic Loss: Non-Monotonicity of the Loss Improves Optimization Efficiencycited by 34
  13. 2020Stochasticity of Deterministic Gradient Descent: Large Learning Rate for Multiscale Objective Functioncited by 26
  14. 2024Large Stepsize Gradient Descent for Non-Homogeneous Two-Layer Networks: Margin Improvement and Fast Optimizationcited by 17
  15. 2021A Closer Look at Prototype Classifier for Few-shot Image Classificationcited by 15
  16. 2021Surrogate Regret Bounds for Polyhedral Lossescited by 15
  17. 2024Flavors of Margin: Implicit Bias of Steepest Descent in Homogeneous Neural Networkscited by 13
  18. 2024The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Multiclass Datacited by 11
  19. 2025Loss Functions and Operators Generated by f-Divergencescited by 10
  20. 2024Gradient Descent on Logistic Regression with Non-Separable Data and Large Step Sizescited by 9
  21. 2023Unified Binary and Multiclass Margin-Based Classificationcited by 8
  22. 2024Online Structured Prediction with Fenchel--Young Losses and Improved Surrogate Regret for Online Multiclass Classification with Logistic Losscited by 7
  23. 2025Revisiting Online Learning Approach to Inverse Linear Optimization: A Fenchel-Young Loss Perspective and Gap-Dependent Regret Analysiscited by 7
  24. 2024From Logistic Regression to the Perceptron Algorithm: Exploring Gradient Descent with Large Step Sizescited by 5
  25. 2024Proper losses regret at least 1/2-ordercited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.