Online Convex Optimization Perspective for Learning from Dynamically Revealed Preferences
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the problem of online learning (OL) from revealed preferences: a learner wishes to learn a non-strategic agent's private utility function through observing the agent's utility-maximizing actions in a changing environment. We adopt an online inverse optimization setup, where the learner observes a stream of agent's actions in an online fashion and the learning performance is measured by regret associated with a loss function. We first characterize a special but broad class of agent's utility functions, then utilize this structure in designing a new convex loss function. We establish that the regret with respect to our new loss function also bounds the regret with respect to all other usual loss functions in the literature. This allows us to design a flexible OL framework that enables a unified treatment of loss functions and supports a variety of online convex optimization algorithms. We demonstrate with theoretical and empirical evidence that our framework based on the new loss function (in particular online Mirror Descent) has significant advantages in terms of regret performance and solution time over other OL algorithms from the literature and bypasses the previous technical assumptions as well.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2023Maximum Optimality Margin: A Unified Approach for Contextual Linear Programming and Inverse Linear Programmingcited by 13
- 2023Learning in Inverse Optimization: Incenter Cost, Augmented Suboptimality Loss, and Algorithmscited by 10
- 2025Revisiting Online Learning Approach to Inverse Linear Optimization: A Fenchel-Young Loss Perspective and Gap-Dependent Regret Analysiscited by 7
- 2025Online Inverse Linear Optimization: Efficient Logarithmic-Regret Algorithm, Robustness to Suboptimality, and Lower Boundcited by 7
- 2026Finite and Corruption-Robust Regret Bounds in Online Inverse Linear Optimization under M-Convex Action Setscited by 6
- 2024Exact Solution to Data-Driven Inverse Optimization of MILPs in Finite Time via Gradient-Based Methodscited by 3
- 2026Explicit Iteration Complexity of Exact Data-Driven Inverse Optimization for Integer Linear Programscited by 1
- 2026Explicit Iteration Complexity of Exact Data-Driven Inverse Optimization for Integer Linear Programs24 Jul 2026
- 2026Finite and Corruption-Robust Regret Bounds in Online Inverse Linear Optimization under M-Convex Action Sets2 Feb 2026
- 2025Online Inverse Linear Optimization: Efficient Logarithmic-Regret Algorithm, Robustness to Suboptimality, and Lower Bound24 Jan 2025
- 2025Revisiting Online Learning Approach to Inverse Linear Optimization: A Fenchel-Young Loss Perspective and Gap-Dependent Regret Analysis23 Jan 2025
- 2024Exact Solution to Data-Driven Inverse Optimization of MILPs in Finite Time via Gradient-Based Methods23 May 2024
- 2023Learning in Inverse Optimization: Incenter Cost, Augmented Suboptimality Loss, and Algorithms12 May 2023
- 2023Maximum Optimality Margin: A Unified Approach for Contextual Linear Programming and Inverse Linear Programming26 Jan 2023