mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Double descent in quantum kernel methods

arXiv 2501.10077 ↗First posted 17 Jan 2025quant-ph cs.LG stat.MLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The double descent phenomenon challenges traditional statistical learning theory by revealing scenarios where larger models do not necessarily lead to reduced performance on unseen data. While this counterintuitive behavior has been observed in a variety of classical machine learning models, particularly modern neural network architectures, it remains elusive within the context of quantum machine learning. In this work, we analytically demonstrate that linear regression models in quantum feature spaces can exhibit double descent behavior by drawing on insights from classical linear regression and random matrix theory. Additionally, our numerical experiments on quantum kernel methods across different real-world datasets and system sizes further confirm the existence of a test error peak, a characteristic feature of double descent. Our findings provide evidence that quantum models can operate in the modern, overparameterized regime without experiencing overfitting, potentially opening pathways to improved learning performance beyond traditional statistical learning theory.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 57 of its 95 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jan 2025.

Builds on

57 of 95 references.

References · 57

  1. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
  2. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
  3. 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
  4. 2018A Convergence Theory for Deep Learning via Over-Parameterizationcited by 784
  5. 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 713
  6. 2020Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 687
  7. 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
  8. 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 654
  9. 2019Benign Overfitting in Linear Regressioncited by 544
  10. 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 508
  11. 2014In Search of the Real Inductive Bias: On the Role of Implicit Regularization in Deep Learningcited by 339
  12. 2020Power of data in quantum machine learningcited by 336
38 more
  1. 2020The effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum machine learning modelscited by 328
  2. 2020A rigorous and robust quantum speed-up in supervised machine learningcited by 270
  3. 2017High-dimensional dynamics of generalization error in neural networkscited by 238
  4. 2021Supervised quantum machine learning models are kernel methodscited by 199
  5. 2018Sensitivity and Generalization in Neural Networks: an Empirical Studycited by 187
  6. 2024Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Computingcited by 130
  7. 2019Harmless interpolation of noisy data in regressioncited by 121
  8. 2021Theory of overparametrization in quantum neural networkscited by 100
  9. 2021Information-theoretic bounds on quantum advantage in machine learningcited by 95
  10. 2021Quantum machine learning beyond kernel methodscited by 91
  11. 2022Exponential concentration in quantum kernel methodscited by 89
  12. 2019Scaling description of generalization with number of parameters in deep learningcited by 83
  13. 2021Encoding-dependent generalization bounds for parametrized quantum circuitscited by 81
  14. 2020Understanding Double Descent Requires a Fine-Grained Bias-Variance Decompositioncited by 75
  15. 2021Training Quantum Embedding Kernels on Near-Term Quantum Computerscited by 69
  16. 2018A jamming transition from under- to over-parametrization affects loss landscape and generalizationcited by 65
  17. 2022Limitations of Neural Collapse for Understanding Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 63
  18. 2020On the Quantum versus Classical Learnability of Discrete Distributionscited by 57
  19. 2021A Farewell to the Bias-Variance Tradeoff? An Overview of the Theory of Overparameterized Machine Learningcited by 54
  20. 2023Understanding quantum machine learning also requires rethinking generalizationcited by 48
  21. 2020Random Matrix Theory Proves that Deep Learning Representations of GAN-data Behave as Gaussian Mixturescited by 47
  22. 2021Representation Learning via Quantum Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 40
  23. 2018The loss landscape of overparameterized neural networkscited by 38
  24. 2023Double Descent Demystified: Identifying, Interpreting & Ablating the Sources of a Deep Learning Puzzlecited by 36
  25. 2021Capacity and quantum geometry of parametrized quantum circuitscited by 32
  26. 2023A U-turn on Double Descent: Rethinking Parameter Counting in Statistical Learningcited by 32
  27. 2020Memorizing without overfitting: Bias, variance, and interpolation in over-parameterized modelscited by 26
  28. 2021Structural risk minimization for quantum linear classifierscited by 24
  29. 2024On the relation between trainability and dequantization of variational quantum learning modelscited by 24
  30. 2023Potential and limitations of random Fourier features for dequantizing quantum machine learningcited by 22
  31. 2022Analytic theory for the dynamics of wide quantum neural networkscited by 21
  32. 2023Exponential separations between classical and quantum learnerscited by 21
  33. 2020Learning Unitaries by Gradient Descentcited by 20
  34. 2022Problem-Dependent Power of Quantum Neural Networks on Multi-Class Classificationcited by 20
  35. 2023On fundamental aspects of quantum extreme learning machinescited by 18
  36. 2023On the expressivity of embedding quantum kernelscited by 17
  37. 2021Quantum tangent kernelcited by 14
  38. 2022A Convergence Theory for Over-parameterized Variational Quantum Eigensolverscited by 14

50 most cited of 57 All 57 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 5.

9 papers.