Double descent in quantum kernel methods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The double descent phenomenon challenges traditional statistical learning theory by revealing scenarios where larger models do not necessarily lead to reduced performance on unseen data. While this counterintuitive behavior has been observed in a variety of classical machine learning models, particularly modern neural network architectures, it remains elusive within the context of quantum machine learning. In this work, we analytically demonstrate that linear regression models in quantum feature spaces can exhibit double descent behavior by drawing on insights from classical linear regression and random matrix theory. Additionally, our numerical experiments on quantum kernel methods across different real-world datasets and system sizes further confirm the existence of a test error peak, a characteristic feature of double descent. Our findings provide evidence that quantum models can operate in the modern, overparameterized regime without experiencing overfitting, potentially opening pathways to improved learning performance beyond traditional statistical learning theory.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 57 of its 95 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jan 2025.
Builds on
57 of 95 references.
References · 57
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
- 2018A Convergence Theory for Deep Learning via Over-Parameterizationcited by 784
- 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 713
- 2020Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 687
- 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
- 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 654
- 2019Benign Overfitting in Linear Regressioncited by 544
- 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 508
- 2014In Search of the Real Inductive Bias: On the Role of Implicit Regularization in Deep Learningcited by 339
- 2020Power of data in quantum machine learningcited by 336
38 more
- 2020The effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum machine learning modelscited by 328
- 2020A rigorous and robust quantum speed-up in supervised machine learningcited by 270
- 2017High-dimensional dynamics of generalization error in neural networkscited by 238
- 2021Supervised quantum machine learning models are kernel methodscited by 199
- 2018Sensitivity and Generalization in Neural Networks: an Empirical Studycited by 187
- 2024Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Computingcited by 130
- 2019Harmless interpolation of noisy data in regressioncited by 121
- 2021Theory of overparametrization in quantum neural networkscited by 100
- 2021Information-theoretic bounds on quantum advantage in machine learningcited by 95
- 2021Quantum machine learning beyond kernel methodscited by 91
- 2022Exponential concentration in quantum kernel methodscited by 89
- 2019Scaling description of generalization with number of parameters in deep learningcited by 83
- 2021Encoding-dependent generalization bounds for parametrized quantum circuitscited by 81
- 2020Understanding Double Descent Requires a Fine-Grained Bias-Variance Decompositioncited by 75
- 2021Training Quantum Embedding Kernels on Near-Term Quantum Computerscited by 69
- 2018A jamming transition from under- to over-parametrization affects loss landscape and generalizationcited by 65
- 2022Limitations of Neural Collapse for Understanding Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 63
- 2020On the Quantum versus Classical Learnability of Discrete Distributionscited by 57
- 2021A Farewell to the Bias-Variance Tradeoff? An Overview of the Theory of Overparameterized Machine Learningcited by 54
- 2023Understanding quantum machine learning also requires rethinking generalizationcited by 48
- 2020Random Matrix Theory Proves that Deep Learning Representations of GAN-data Behave as Gaussian Mixturescited by 47
- 2021Representation Learning via Quantum Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 40
- 2018The loss landscape of overparameterized neural networkscited by 38
- 2023Double Descent Demystified: Identifying, Interpreting & Ablating the Sources of a Deep Learning Puzzlecited by 36
- 2021Capacity and quantum geometry of parametrized quantum circuitscited by 32
- 2023A U-turn on Double Descent: Rethinking Parameter Counting in Statistical Learningcited by 32
- 2020Memorizing without overfitting: Bias, variance, and interpolation in over-parameterized modelscited by 26
- 2021Structural risk minimization for quantum linear classifierscited by 24
- 2024On the relation between trainability and dequantization of variational quantum learning modelscited by 24
- 2023Potential and limitations of random Fourier features for dequantizing quantum machine learningcited by 22
- 2022Analytic theory for the dynamics of wide quantum neural networkscited by 21
- 2023Exponential separations between classical and quantum learnerscited by 21
- 2020Learning Unitaries by Gradient Descentcited by 20
- 2022Problem-Dependent Power of Quantum Neural Networks on Multi-Class Classificationcited by 20
- 2023On fundamental aspects of quantum extreme learning machinescited by 18
- 2023On the expressivity of embedding quantum kernelscited by 17
- 2021Quantum tangent kernelcited by 14
- 2022A Convergence Theory for Over-parameterized Variational Quantum Eigensolverscited by 14
50 most cited of 57 All 57 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 5.
9 papers.
- 2026Kernel-based optimization of measurement operators for quantum reservoir computerscited by 2
- 2026A PAC-Bayesian approach to generalization for quantum modelscited by 2
- 2025Benign Overfitting with Quantum Kernelscited by 1
- 2025Double Descent and Overparameterization in Particle Physics Datacited by 1
- 2026Theory and interpretability of Quantum Extreme Learning Machines: a Pauli-transfer matrix approachcited by 1
- 2025Position: Quantum Kernel Machines Should Move Beyond Scalar-Valued Kernels to Realize Their Potentialcited by 0
- 2025The interplay of robustness and generalization in quantum machine learningcited by 0
- 2026From Reachability to Learnability: Geometric Design Principles for Quantum Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2026Cautious optimism for deep parameterized quantum circuitscited by 0
- 2026Cautious optimism for deep parameterized quantum circuits23 Jul 2026
- 2026A PAC-Bayesian approach to generalization for quantum models24 Mar 2026
- 2026From Reachability to Learnability: Geometric Design Principles for Quantum Neural Networks3 Mar 2026
- 2026Theory and interpretability of Quantum Extreme Learning Machines: a Pauli-transfer matrix approach20 Feb 2026
- 2026Kernel-based optimization of measurement operators for quantum reservoir computers16 Feb 2026
- 2025Double Descent and Overparameterization in Particle Physics Data1 Sep 2025
- 2025The interplay of robustness and generalization in quantum machine learning10 Jun 2025
- 2025Position: Quantum Kernel Machines Should Move Beyond Scalar-Valued Kernels to Realize Their Potential4 Jun 2025
- 2025Benign Overfitting with Quantum Kernels21 Mar 2025