Cautious optimism for deep parameterized quantum circuits
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A central challenge in quantum machine learning is understanding the scaling behavior of parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs). In particular, it remains unclear how their performance on unseen data changes as the number of trainable parameters increases. Prior works have derived formal generalization guarantees for quantum models, but it is well-known that many such results do not fully characterize generalization behavior in practice. In this work, we show that gradient-based PQCs can exhibit improved performance on unseen data as model size increases, displaying the phenomenon of double descent. This contrasts with the traditional view that larger models lead to degraded generalization. We provide analytical results rigorously underpinning this behavior by leveraging add-one-in perturbation techniques and spectral properties of random matrices. We support these results with numerical experiments on re-uploading PQCs across several data sets and training set sizes, consistently observing the predicted double descent behavior. While other obstacles on the path toward practical quantum machine learning remain, our finding that deeper parameterized quantum circuits do not necessarily exhibit degraded performance provides reasons for cautious optimism.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2026.
Builds on
27 of 58 references.
References · 27
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 927
- 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 672
- 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 665
- 2018Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapescited by 630
- 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 513
- 2019The generalization error of random features regression: Precise asymptotics and double descent curvecited by 413
- 2020The power of quantum neural networkscited by 379
- 2021Generalization in quantum machine learning from few training datacited by 216
- 2020Noise-Induced Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 193
- 2020Double Trouble in Double Descent : Bias and Variance(s) in the Lazy Regimecited by 95
- 2022Exponential concentration in quantum kernel methodscited by 90
15 more
- 2021Encoding-dependent generalization bounds for parametrized quantum circuitscited by 82
- 2020On the Quantum versus Classical Learnability of Discrete Distributionscited by 57
- 2021A Farewell to the Bias-Variance Tradeoff? An Overview of the Theory of Overparameterized Machine Learningcited by 57
- 2023Understanding quantum machine learning also requires rethinking generalizationcited by 49
- 2020Random Matrix Theory Proves that Deep Learning Representations of GAN-data Behave as Gaussian Mixturescited by 47
- 2020Scaling Down Deep Learning with MNIST-1Dcited by 25
- 2022Problem-Dependent Power of Quantum Neural Networks on Multi-Class Classificationcited by 20
- 2023Mildly Overparameterized ReLU Networks Have a Favorable Loss Landscapecited by 17
- 2022Phenomenology of Double Descent in Finite-Width Neural Networkscited by 12
- 2024A Unified Theory of Quantum Neural Network Loss Landscapescited by 12
- 2022A super-polynomial quantum-classical separation for density modellingcited by 9
- 2025Double descent in quantum kernel methodscited by 9
- 2025Prospects for quantum advantage in machine learning from the representability of functionscited by 4
- 2026A PAC-Bayesian approach to generalization for quantum modelscited by 2
- 2026Provable learning separation for predicting time-evolution of quantum many-body systemscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.