mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On the expressivity of embedding quantum kernels

arXiv 2309.14419 ↗First posted 25 Sep 2023quant-ph cs.LG stat.MLcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

One of the most natural connections between quantum and classical machine learning has been established in the context of kernel methods. Kernel methods rely on kernels, which are inner products of feature vectors living in large feature spaces. Quantum kernels are typically evaluated by explicitly constructing quantum feature states and then taking their inner product, here called embedding quantum kernels. Since classical kernels are usually evaluated without using the feature vectors explicitly, we wonder how expressive embedding quantum kernels are. In this work, we raise the fundamental question: can all quantum kernels be expressed as the inner product of quantum feature states? Our first result is positive: Invoking computational universality, we find that for any kernel function there always exists a corresponding quantum feature map and an embedding quantum kernel. The more operational reading of the question is concerned with efficient constructions, however. In a second part, we formalize the question of universality of efficient embedding quantum kernels. For shift-invariant kernels, we use the technique of random Fourier features to show that they are universal within the broad class of all kernels which allow a variant of efficient Fourier sampling. We then extend this result to a new class of so-called composition kernels, which we show also contains projected quantum kernels introduced in recent works. After proving the universality of embedding quantum kernels for both shift-invariant and composition kernels, we identify the directions towards new, more exotic, and unexplored quantum kernel families, for which it still remains open whether they correspond to efficient embedding quantum kernels.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2023.

Builds on

20 of 59 references.

References · 20

  1. 2020Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 692
  2. 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 665
  3. 2018Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapescited by 630
  4. 2020Power of data in quantum machine learningcited by 338
  5. 2020The effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum machine learning modelscited by 333
  6. 2019Parameterized quantum circuits as machine learning modelscited by 332
  7. 2020A rigorous and robust quantum speed-up in supervised machine learningcited by 271
  8. 2021Supervised quantum machine learning models are kernel methodscited by 200
  9. 2015On the Equivalence between Kernel Quadrature Rules and Random Feature Expansionscited by 138
  10. 2021Quantum machine learning beyond kernel methodscited by 92
  11. 2021The Inductive Bias of Quantum Kernelscited by 91
  12. 2021Provably efficient machine learning for quantum many-body problemscited by 91
8 more
  1. 2021Encoding-dependent generalization bounds for parametrized quantum circuitscited by 82
  2. 2021Training Quantum Embedding Kernels on Near-Term Quantum Computerscited by 69
  3. 2020On the Quantum versus Classical Learnability of Discrete Distributionscited by 57
  4. 2022Classical surrogates for quantum learning modelscited by 39
  5. 2021Automatic design of quantum feature mapscited by 28
  6. 2021Structural risk minimization for quantum linear classifierscited by 24
  7. 2023Potential and limitations of random Fourier features for dequantizing quantum machine learningcited by 22
  8. 2020Learning with Optimized Random Features: Exponential Speedup by Quantum Machine Learning without Sparsity and Low-Rank Assumptionscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 6; 2025: 7; 2026: 3.

17 papers.

Sort:

By area: