Kernel-based optimization of measurement operators for quantum reservoir computers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Finding optimal measurement operators is crucial for the performance of quantum reservoir computers (QRCs), since they employ a fixed quantum feature map. We formulate the training of both stateless (quantum extreme learning machines, QELMs) and stateful (memory dependent) QRCs in the framework of kernel ridge regression. We thus extend the kernel viewpoint of supervised quantum models to recurrent QRCs by deriving an exact Hilbert--Schmidt kernel representation of the optimal readout observable on history space. This approach renders an optimal measurement operator that minimizes prediction error for a given reservoir and training dataset. For large qubit numbers, this method is more efficient than the conventional training of QRCs. We discuss efficiency and practical implementation strategies, including Pauli basis decomposition and operator diagonalization, to adapt the optimal observable to hardware constraints. To demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach, we present numerical experiments on image classification and time series prediction tasks, including chaotic and strongly non-Markovian systems. The developed method can also be applied to other quantum machine learning models.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2026.
Builds on
21 of 78 references.
References · 21
- 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 654
- 2020Power of data in quantum machine learningcited by 336
- 2020The effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum machine learning modelscited by 328
- 2020Predicting Many Properties of a Quantum System from Very Few Measurementscited by 229
- 2021Supervised quantum machine learning models are kernel methodscited by 199
- 2020Robust data encodings for quantum classifierscited by 91
- 2021Quantum machine learning beyond kernel methodscited by 91
- 2021The Inductive Bias of Quantum Kernelscited by 90
- 2022Bandwidth Enables Generalization in Quantum Kernel Modelscited by 32
- 2021Structural risk minimization for quantum linear classifierscited by 24
- 2023On fundamental aspects of quantum extreme learning machinescited by 18
- 2020Reservoir Computing meets Recurrent Kernels and Structured Transformscited by 15
9 more
- 2025Learning to Measure Quantum Neural Networkscited by 15
- 2023A Unified Framework for Trace-induced Quantum Kernelscited by 12
- 2024Optimal training of finitely-sampled quantum reservoir computers for forecasting of chaotic dynamicscited by 9
- 2024Infinite-dimensional next-generation reservoir computingcited by 9
- 2025Double descent in quantum kernel methodscited by 9
- 2025Adaptive Non-local Observable on Quantum Neural Networkscited by 7
- 2025Learning to Program Quantum Measurements for Machine Learningcited by 7
- 2022Quantum Bayesian Computationcited by 2
- 2025You Only Measure Once: On Designing Single-Shot Quantum Machine Learning Modelscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.