Position: Quantum Kernel Machines Should Move Beyond Scalar-Valued Kernels to Realize Their Potential
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Quantum kernel functions built using quantum-mechanical principles and have emerged as a centerpiece of quantum machine learning. The initial enthusiasm for quantum kernel machines has been tempered by recent studies suggesting that quantum kernels could not offer significant computational or statistical advantages when learning from classical data. However, most of the research in this area has been devoted to scalar-valued kernels in standard classification or regression settings for which classical kernel methods are efficient and effective, leaving very little room for improvement with quantum kernels. In this position paper, we argue that progress in this field requires moving beyond scalar-valued kernels toward more expressive kernel frameworks. Scalar-valued kernels lack the degrees of freedom necessary to fully exploit intrinsically quantum resources such as entanglement and are not rich enough to deal with complex learning tasks where classical learning methods struggle. Building on recent advances in operator-valued kernel learning and C^*-algebraic kernel representations, we propose a roadmap for designing quantum kernels capable of leveraging entanglement and non-commutative structures to tackle complex structured prediction problems. To support this viewpoint, we present an initial proof-of-concept illustrating how quantum operator-valued kernel formulations can reveal structural dependencies that remain difficult to access for scalar-valued kernel methods. This shift in focus could open a pathway toward a new generation of quantum kernel machines and a more faithful exploration of their potential advantages.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 102 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2025.
Builds on
44 of 102 references.
References · 44
- 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 927
- 2018Link Prediction Based on Graph Neural Networkscited by 832
- 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 665
- 2019Benign Overfitting in Linear Regressioncited by 549
- 2020Power of data in quantum machine learningcited by 338
- 2020A rigorous and robust quantum speed-up in supervised machine learningcited by 271
- 2021Supervised quantum machine learning models are kernel methodscited by 200
- 2020Random Features for Kernel Approximation: A Survey on Algorithms, Theory, and Beyondcited by 109
- 2021Theory of overparametrization in quantum neural networkscited by 100
- 2017Quantum machine learning: a classical perspectivecited by 95
- 2021Quantum machine learning beyond kernel methodscited by 92
- 2021The Inductive Bias of Quantum Kernelscited by 91
32 more
- 2022Exponential concentration in quantum kernel methodscited by 90
- 2020A Graph to Graphs Framework for Retrosynthesis Predictioncited by 86
- 2019The Born Supremacy: Quantum Advantage and Training of an Ising Born Machinecited by 76
- 2021Training Quantum Embedding Kernels on Near-Term Quantum Computerscited by 69
- 2020Graph Kernels: State-of-the-Art and Future Challengescited by 63
- 2015Operator-valued Kernels for Learning from Functional Response Datacited by 60
- 2023Understanding quantum machine learning also requires rethinking generalizationcited by 49
- 2021Towards understanding the power of quantum kernels in the NISQ eracited by 43
- 2023Challenges and Opportunities in Quantum Optimizationcited by 42
- 2022Bandwidth Enables Generalization in Quantum Kernel Modelscited by 32
- 2019Quantum Computing: Lecture Notescited by 14
- 2023Quantum Kernel Alignment with Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 14
- 2014Scalable Matrix-valued Kernel Learning for High-dimensional Nonlinear Multivariate Regression and Granger Causalitycited by 13
- 2022Quantum Advantage Seeker with Kernels (QuASK): a software framework to speed up the research in quantum machine learningcited by 11
- 2021Reproducing kernel Hilbert C*-module and kernel mean embeddingscited by 10
- 2022Automatic and effective discovery of quantum kernelscited by 10
- 2025Double descent in quantum kernel methodscited by 9
- 2019Towards a theory of non-commutative optimization: geodesic first and second order methods for moment maps and polytopescited by 7
- 2021Entangled Kernels -- Beyond Separabilitycited by 7
- 2022Learning in RKHM: a C^*-Algebraic Twist for Kernel Machinescited by 7
- 2023Deep Learning with Kernels through RKHM and the Perron-Frobenius Operatorcited by 7
- 2024Neural auto-designer for enhanced quantum kernelscited by 7
- 2020Partial Trace Regression and Low-Rank Kraus Decompositioncited by 5
- 2021Quantum Perceptron Revisited: Computational-Statistical Tradeoffscited by 5
- 2023Transition Role of Entangled Data in Quantum Machine Learningcited by 5
- 2018Multi-view Metric Learning in Vector-valued Kernel Spacescited by 3
- 2024Deep Sketched Output Kernel Regression for Structured Predictioncited by 2
- 2025Benign Overfitting with Quantum Kernelscited by 2
- 2013Learning Output Kernels for Multi-Task Problemscited by 1
- 2017Bounds on entanglement dimensions and quantum graph parameters via noncommutative polynomial optimizationcited by 1
- 2021Noncommutative Christoffel-Darboux Kernelscited by 1
- 2024Spectral Truncation Kernels: Noncommutativity in C^*-algebraic Kernel Machinescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.