Open set label noise learning with robust sample selection and margin-guided module
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In recent years, the remarkable success of deep neural networks (DNNs) in computer vision is largely due to large-scale, high-quality labeled datasets. Training directly on real-world datasets with label noise may result in overfitting. The traditional method is limited to deal with closed set label noise, where noisy training data has true class labels within the known label space. However, there are some real-world datasets containing open set label noise, which means that some samples belong to an unknown class outside the known label space. To address the open set label noise problem, we introduce a method based on Robust Sample Selection and Margin-Guided Module (RSS-MGM). Firstly, unlike the prior clean sample selection approach, which only select a limited number of clean samples, a robust sample selection module combines small loss selection or high-confidence sample selection to obtain more clean samples. Secondly, to efficiently distinguish open set label noise and closed set ones, margin functions are designed to filter open-set data and closed set data. Thirdly, different processing methods are selected for different types of samples in order to fully utilize the data's prior information and optimize the whole model. Furthermore, extensive experimental results with noisy labeled data from benchmark datasets and real-world datasets, such as CIFAR-100N-C, CIFAR80N-O, WebFG-469, and Food101N, indicate that our approach outperforms many state-of-the-art label noise learning methods. Especially, it can more accurately divide open set label noise samples and closed set ones.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jan 2025.
Builds on
47 of 84 references.
References · 47
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,282
- 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2016YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Strongercited by 1,429
- 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
35 more
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
- 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 441
- 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
- 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
- 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
- 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
- 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
- 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
- 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 259
- 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
- 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
- 2017CleanNet: Transfer Learning for Scalable Image Classifier Training with Label Noisecited by 181
- 2020Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approachcited by 158
- 2015A Light CNN for Deep Face Representation with Noisy Labelscited by 126
- 2020Self-Adaptive Training: beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 126
- 2018Iterative Learning with Open-set Noisy Labelscited by 108
- 2021Learning with Feature-Dependent Label Noise: A Progressive Approachcited by 102
- 2021TACo: Token-aware Cascade Contrastive Learning for Video-Text Alignmentcited by 102
- 2020Multi-Objective Interpolation Training for Robustness to Label Noisecited by 86
- 2021Jo-SRC: A Contrastive Approach for Combating Noisy Labelscited by 80
- 2020Error-Bounded Correction of Noisy Labelscited by 74
- 2020MoPro: Webly Supervised Learning with Momentum Prototypescited by 66
- 2021Hard Sample Aware Noise Robust Learning for Histopathology Image Classificationcited by 48
- 2022ProMix: Combating Label Noise via Maximizing Clean Sample Utilitycited by 48
- 2021LongReMix: Robust Learning with High Confidence Samples in a Noisy Label Environmentcited by 40
- 2021Webly Supervised Fine-Grained Recognition: Benchmark Datasets and An Approachcited by 32
- 2020EvidentialMix: Learning with Combined Open-set and Closed-set Noisy Labelscited by 28
- 2024Robust Semi-supervised Learning by Wisely Leveraging Open-set Datacited by 20
- 2020Salvage Reusable Samples from Noisy Data for Robust Learningcited by 19
- 2020Suppressing Mislabeled Data via Grouping and Self-Attentioncited by 17
- 2017Towards Automatic Construction of Diverse, High-quality Image Datasetcited by 13
- 2022Is your noise correction noisy? PLS: Robustness to label noise with two stage detectioncited by 11
- 2023Unlocking the Power of Open Set : A New Perspective for Open-Set Noisy Label Learningcited by 8
- 2021Instance Correction for Learning with Open-set Noisy Labelscited by 7
- 2022Model and Data Agreement for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.