Puzzle Similarity: A Perceptually-guided Cross-Reference Metric for Artifact Detection in 3D Scene Reconstructions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern reconstruction techniques can effectively model complex 3D scenes from sparse 2D views. However, automatically assessing the quality of novel views and identifying artifacts is challenging due to the lack of ground truth images and the limitations of no-reference image metrics in predicting reliable artifact maps. The absence of such metrics hinders assessment of the quality of novel views and limits the adoption of post-processing techniques, such as inpainting, to enhance reconstruction quality. To tackle this, recent work has established a new category of metrics (cross-reference), predicting image quality solely by leveraging context from alternate viewpoint captures (arXiv:2404.14409). In this work, we propose a new cross-reference metric, Puzzle Similarity, which is designed to localize artifacts in novel views. Our approach utilizes image patch statistics from the training views to establish a scene-specific distribution, later used to identify poorly reconstructed regions in the novel views. Given the lack of good measures to evaluate cross-reference methods in the context of 3D reconstruction, we collected a novel human-labeled dataset of artifact and distortion maps in unseen reconstructed views. Through this dataset, we demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art localization of artifacts in novel views, correlating with human assessment, even without aligned references. We can leverage our new metric to enhance applications like automatic image restoration, guided acquisition, or 3D reconstruction from sparse inputs. Find the project page at https://nihermann.github.io/puzzlesim/ .
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Nov 2024.
Builds on
37 of 77 references.
References · 37
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
- 2022Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understandingcited by 6,355
- 20233D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field Renderingcited by 6,226
- 2022Instant Neural Graphics Primitives with a Multiresolution Hash Encodingcited by 3,723
- 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,506
- 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,497
- 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
- 2021Plenoxels: Radiance Fields without Neural Networkscited by 1,613
- 2020pixelNeRF: Neural Radiance Fields from One or Few Imagescited by 1,584
25 more
- 2022Imagic: Text-Based Real Image Editing with Diffusion Modelscited by 1,178
- 2021MUSIQ: Multi-scale Image Quality Transformercited by 1,081
- 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,060
- 2022Exploring CLIP for Assessing the Look and Feel of Imagescited by 991
- 2021PlenOctrees for Real-time Rendering of Neural Radiance Fieldscited by 905
- 2021Resolution-robust Large Mask Inpainting with Fourier Convolutionscited by 738
- 2018DeepVoxels: Learning Persistent 3D Feature Embeddingscited by 405
- 2023Blind Image Quality Assessment via Vision-Language Correspondence: A Multitask Learning Perspectivecited by 280
- 2021DONeRF: Towards Real-Time Rendering of Compact Neural Radiance Fields using Depth Oracle Networkscited by 232
- 2019From Patches to Pictures (PaQ-2-PiQ): Mapping the Perceptual Space of Picture Qualitycited by 223
- 2023Depth-Regularized Optimization for 3D Gaussian Splatting in Few-Shot Imagescited by 173
- 2023Rich Human Feedback for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 141
- 2015Learning to Compare Image Patches via Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 109
- 2023Improving Multimodal Datasets with Image Captioningcited by 93
- 2023Bayes' Rays: Uncertainty Quantification for Neural Radiance Fieldscited by 91
- 2020Transformer for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 76
- 2024Fast Feedforward 3D Gaussian Splatting Compressioncited by 52
- 2023Perceptual Artifacts Localization for Image Synthesis Taskscited by 43
- 2023HDR-VDP-3: A multi-metric for predicting image differences, quality and contrast distortions in high dynamic range and regular contentcited by 41
- 2024ColorVideoVDP: A visual difference predictor for image, video and display distortionscited by 34
- 2023WaveNeRF: Wavelet-based Generalizable Neural Radiance Fieldscited by 24
- 2017Towards a quality metric for dense light fieldscited by 15
- 2024CrossScore: Towards Multi-View Image Evaluation and Scoringcited by 6
- 2024Deep Shape-Texture Statistics for Completely Blind Image Quality Evaluationcited by 5
- 2022Perceptual Visibility Model for Temporal Contrast Changes in Peripherycited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Beyond Spherical Harmonics: Rethinking Appearance Models for Radiance Reconstructioncited by 1
- 2026PR-IQA: Partial-Reference Image Quality Assessment for Diffusion-Based Novel View Synthesiscited by 0
- 2026From Explicit References to Scene Manifolds: Distributional Fidelity and Realism for Radiance Field Quality Assessmentcited by 0
- 2026From Explicit References to Scene Manifolds: Distributional Fidelity and Realism for Radiance Field Quality Assessment7 Sep 2026
- 2026Beyond Spherical Harmonics: Rethinking Appearance Models for Radiance Reconstruction8 Jun 2026
- 2026PR-IQA: Partial-Reference Image Quality Assessment for Diffusion-Based Novel View Synthesis6 Apr 2026