mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Embedding Democratic Values into Social Media AIs via Societal Objective Functions

arXiv 2307.13912 ↗First posted 26 Jul 2023cs.HC cs.AIcited by 25

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Can we design artificial intelligence (AI) systems that rank our social media feeds to consider democratic values such as mitigating partisan animosity as part of their objective functions? We introduce a method for translating established, vetted social scientific constructs into AI objective functions, which we term societal objective functions, and demonstrate the method with application to the political science construct of anti-democratic attitudes. Traditionally, we have lacked observable outcomes to use to train such models, however, the social sciences have developed survey instruments and qualitative codebooks for these constructs, and their precision facilitates translation into detailed prompts for large language models. We apply this method to create a democratic attitude model that estimates the extent to which a social media post promotes anti-democratic attitudes, and test this democratic attitude model across three studies. In Study 1, we first test the attitudinal and behavioral effectiveness of the intervention among US partisans (N=1,380) by manually annotating (alpha=.895) social media posts with anti-democratic attitude scores and testing several feed ranking conditions based on these scores. Removal (d=.20) and downranking feeds (d=.25) reduced participants' partisan animosity without compromising their experience and engagement. In Study 2, we scale up the manual labels by creating the democratic attitude model, finding strong agreement with manual labels (rho=.75). Finally, in Study 3, we replicate Study 1 using the democratic attitude model instead of manual labels to test its attitudinal and behavioral impact (N=558), and again find that the feed downranking using the societal objective function reduced partisan animosity (d=.25). This method presents a novel strategy to draw on social science theory and methods to mitigate societal harms in social media AIs.

Key facts. Cited by 25 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 116 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2023.

Builds on

27 of 116 references.

References · 27

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  4. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
  5. 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 924
  6. 2022Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Modelscited by 832
  7. 2023Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?cited by 773
  8. 2023Distilling Step-by-Step! Outperforming Larger Language Models with Less Training Data and Smaller Model Sizescited by 737
  9. 2019The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generationcited by 541
  10. 2023Exploiting Programmatic Behavior of LLMs: Dual-Use Through Standard Security Attackscited by 278
  11. 2023Can Large Language Models Transform Computational Social Science?cited by 250
  12. 2021Want To Reduce Labeling Cost? GPT-3 Can Helpcited by 196
15 more
  1. 2023Is ChatGPT better than Human Annotators? Potential and Limitations of ChatGPT in Explaining Implicit Hate Speechcited by 166
  2. 2019Distilling Task-Specific Knowledge from BERT into Simple Neural Networkscited by 153
  3. 2017Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophycited by 149
  4. 2023Supporting Qualitative Analysis with Large Language Models: Combining Codebook with GPT-3 for Deductive Codingcited by 82
  5. 2023Automated Annotation with Generative AI Requires Validationcited by 76
  6. 2021Algorithmic Amplification of Politics on Twittercited by 38
  7. 2022The Challenge of Understanding What Users Want: Inconsistent Preferences and Engagement Optimizationcited by 29
  8. 2023Accuracy and Political Bias of News Source Credibility Ratings by Large Language Modelscited by 25
  9. 2022Building Human Values into Recommender Systems: An Interdisciplinary Synthesiscited by 22
  10. 2020From Optimizing Engagement to Measuring Valuecited by 21
  11. 2017How algorithmic popularity bias hinders or promotes qualitycited by 20
  12. 2023Bridging Systems: Open Problems for Countering Destructive Divisiveness across Ranking, Recommenders, and Governancecited by 17
  13. 2022Understanding Effects of Algorithmic vs. Community Label on Perceived Accuracy of Hyper-partisan Misinformationcited by 8
  14. 2022Manipulating Twitter Through Deletionscited by 6
  15. 2021Perspective-taking to Reduce Affective Polarization on Social Mediacited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 9; 2025: 9; 2026: 5.

25 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Backdooring Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models with Virtual Prompt Injectioncited by 157
  2. 2023Distributional Preference Learning: Understanding and Accounting for Hidden Context in RLHFcited by 133
  3. 2024Concept Induction: Analyzing Unstructured Text with High-Level Concepts Using LLooMcited by 78
  4. 2025DarkBench: Benchmarking Dark Patterns in Large Language Modelscited by 28
  5. 2024How Susceptible are Large Language Models to Ideological Manipulation?cited by 26
  6. 2024Wikibench: Community-Driven Data Curation for AI Evaluation on Wikipediacited by 18
  7. 2024Value Imprint: A Technique for Auditing the Human Values Embedded in RLHF Datasetscited by 11
  8. 2025Meaning Is Not A Metric: Using LLMs to make cultural context legible at scalecited by 10
  9. 2025What do Large Language Models Say About Animals? Investigating Risks of Animal Harm in Generated Textcited by 9
  10. 2025CoBRA: Programming Cognitive Bias in Social Agents Using Classic Social Science Experimentscited by 8
  11. 2024Legal Minds, Algorithmic Decisions: How LLMs Apply Constitutional Principles in Complex Scenarioscited by 7
  12. 2024Reranking partisan animosity in algorithmic social media feeds alters affective polarizationcited by 7
13 more
  1. 2024Fine-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs): Improved Prompt Injection Attacks Detectioncited by 5
  2. 2025Value Alignment of Social Media Ranking Algorithmscited by 4
  3. 2025CTRL-Rec: Controlling Recommender Systems With Natural Languagecited by 4
  4. 2025Representative Ranking for Deliberation in the Public Spherecited by 2
  5. 2026AI and My Values: User Perceptions of LLMs' Ability to Extract, Embody, and Explain Human Values from Casual Conversationscited by 2
  6. 2024Large Language Models, and LLM-Based Agents, Should Be Used to Enhance the Digital Public Spherecited by 1
  7. 2025The Burden of Interactive Alignment with Inconsistent Preferencescited by 1
  8. 2024Cooperative Evolutionary Pressure and Diminishing Returns Might Explain the Fermi Paradox: On What Super-AIs Are Likecited by 0
  9. 2025Kaleidoscope Gallery: Exploring Ethics and Generative AI Through Artcited by 0
  10. 2026Recommender system in X inadvertently profiles ideological positions of userscited by 0
  11. 2026LLM-Assisted Reranking to Operationalize Nuanced Objectives in Recommender Systemscited by 0
  12. 2026Who Plays Which Role When? Communication Role Dynamics for Peer Recognition and Team Performance Predictioncited by 0
  13. 2026Compass: Continuously Aligning Social Media Feeds via In-Situ Reflectionscited by 0