How Good is ChatGPT at Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT, AI Models and Human Perception
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multimodal deepfakes involving audiovisual manipulations are a growing threat because they are difficult to detect with the naked eye or using unimodal deep learningbased forgery detection methods. Audiovisual forensic models, while more capable than unimodal models, require large training datasets and are computationally expensive for training and inference. Furthermore, these models lack interpretability and often do not generalize well to unseen manipulations. In this study, we examine the detection capabilities of a large language model (LLM) (i.e., ChatGPT) to identify and account for any possible visual and auditory artifacts and manipulations in audiovisual deepfake content. Extensive experiments are conducted on videos from a benchmark multimodal deepfake dataset to evaluate the detection performance of ChatGPT and compare it with the detection capabilities of state-of-the-art multimodal forensic models and humans. Experimental results demonstrate the importance of domain knowledge and prompt engineering for video forgery detection tasks using LLMs. Unlike approaches based on end-to-end learning, ChatGPT can account for spatial and spatiotemporal artifacts and inconsistencies that may exist within or across modalities. Additionally, we discuss the limitations of ChatGPT for multimedia forensic tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2024.
Builds on
28 of 50 references.
References · 28
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,627
- 2021ViViT: A Video Vision Transformercited by 1,620
- 2023A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivitycited by 894
- 2020A Lip Sync Expert Is All You Need for Speech to Lip Generation In The Wildcited by 672
- 2021AST: Audio Spectrogram Transformercited by 643
- 2023MM-REACT: Prompting ChatGPT for Multimodal Reasoning and Actioncited by 517
- 2018MesoNet: a Compact Facial Video Forgery Detection Networkcited by 409
- 2019FSGAN: Subject Agnostic Face Swapping and Reenactmentcited by 320
- 2020Lips Don't Lie: A Generalisable and Robust Approach to Face Forgery Detectioncited by 287
- 2022Learning Audio-Visual Speech Representation by Masked Multimodal Cluster Predictioncited by 287
16 more
- 2018Transfer Learning from Speaker Verification to Multispeaker Text-To-Speech Synthesiscited by 282
- 2023ChatGPT: Jack of all trades, master of nonecited by 204
- 2021FakeAVCeleb: A Novel Audio-Video Multimodal Deepfake Datasetcited by 181
- 2018Capsule-Forensics: Using Capsule Networks to Detect Forged Images and Videoscited by 180
- 2016Fast Face-swap Using Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 119
- 2024Can ChatGPT Detect DeepFakes? A Study of Using Multimodal Large Language Models for Media Forensicscited by 69
- 2023Multimodal ChatGPT for Medical Applications: an Experimental Study of GPT-4Vcited by 38
- 2024How Good is ChatGPT at Face Biometrics? A First Look into Recognition, Soft Biometrics, and Explainabilitycited by 34
- 2021Evaluation of an Audio-Video Multimodal Deepfake Dataset using Unimodal and Multimodal Detectorscited by 32
- 2023Cheap-fake Detection with LLM using Prompt Engineeringcited by 15
- 2022Partially Fake Audio Detection by Self-attention-based Fake Span Discoverycited by 14
- 2022Analyzing Fairness in Deepfake Detection With Massively Annotated Databasescited by 13
- 2023AVTENet: A Human-Cognition-Inspired Audio-Visual Transformer-Based Ensemble Network for Video Deepfake Detectioncited by 8
- 2024Unmasking Illusions: Understanding Human Perception of Audiovisual Deepfakescited by 7
- 2021DeepFake Detection with Inconsistent Head Poses: Reproducibility and Analysiscited by 6
- 2024Research about the Ability of LLM in the Tamper-Detection Areacited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
5 papers.
- 2025Survey on AI-Generated Media Detection: From Non-MLLM to MLLMcited by 12
- 2025Performance Decay in Deepfake Detection: The Limitations of Training on Outdated Datacited by 1
- 2026Investigating the Viability of Employing Multi-modal Large Language Models in the Context of Audio Deepfake Detectioncited by 1
- 2026SAVe: Self-Supervised Audio-visual Deepfake Detection Exploiting Visual Artifacts and Audio-visual Misalignmentcited by 1
- 2026Detecting AI-Generated Video: A Vision-Language Dual-View Surveycited by 1
- 2026Detecting AI-Generated Video: A Vision-Language Dual-View Survey12 Jul 2026
- 2026SAVe: Self-Supervised Audio-visual Deepfake Detection Exploiting Visual Artifacts and Audio-visual Misalignment26 Mar 2026
- 2026Investigating the Viability of Employing Multi-modal Large Language Models in the Context of Audio Deepfake Detection2 Jan 2026
- 2025Performance Decay in Deepfake Detection: The Limitations of Training on Outdated Data10 Nov 2025
- 2025Survey on AI-Generated Media Detection: From Non-MLLM to MLLM7 Feb 2025