Q-SFT: Q-Learning for Language Models via Supervised Fine-Tuning
On the map: Offline RL and imitation learning from data → Language-conditioned policies and VLAs
Abstract (arXiv)
Value-based reinforcement learning (RL) can in principle learn effective policies for a wide range of multi-turn problems, from games to dialogue to robotic control, including via offline RL from static previously collected datasets. However, despite the widespread use of policy gradient methods to train large language models for single turn tasks (e.g., question answering), value-based methods for multi-turn RL in an off-policy or offline setting have proven particularly challenging to scale to the setting of large language models. This setting requires effectively leveraging pretraining, scaling to large architectures with billions of parameters, and training on large datasets, all of which represent major challenges for current value-based RL methods. In this work, we propose a novel offline RL algorithm that addresses these drawbacks, casting Q-learning as a modified supervised fine-tuning (SFT) problem where the probabilities of tokens directly translate to Q-values. In this way we obtain an algorithm that smoothly transitions from maximizing the likelihood of the data during pretraining to learning a near-optimal Q-function during finetuning. Our algorithm has strong theoretical foundations, enjoying performance bounds similar to state-of-the-art Q-learning methods, while in practice utilizing an objective that closely resembles SFT. Because of this, our approach can enjoy the full benefits of the pretraining of language models, without the need to reinitialize any weights before RL finetuning, and without the need to initialize new heads for predicting values or advantages. Empirically, we evaluate our method on both pretrained LLMs and VLMs, on a variety of tasks including both natural language dialogue and robotic manipulation and navigation from images.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Language-conditioned policies and VLAs, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data. Builds on 32 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Nov 2024.
Builds on
32 of 43 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 31
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
- 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 3,080
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
- 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problemscited by 1,920
- 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,809
- 2021Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence Modelingcited by 1,546
- 2020D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,427
19 more
- 2020ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learningcited by 1,205
- 2019Stabilizing Off-Policy Q-Learning via Bootstrapping Error Reductioncited by 840
- 2019Advantage-Weighted Regression: Simple and Scalable Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 782
- 2020MOPO: Model-based Offline Policy Optimizationcited by 636
- 2020MOReL : Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 590
- 2021COMBO: Conservative Offline Model-Based Policy Optimizationcited by 370
- 2021Recursively Summarizing Books with Human Feedbackcited by 290
- 2022Is Reinforcement Learning (Not) for Natural Language Processing: Benchmarks, Baselines, and Building Blocks for Natural Language Policy Optimizationcited by 246
- 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Fisher Divergence Critic Regularizationcited by 238
- 2021Offline RL Without Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 151
- 2024Stop Regressing: Training Value Functions via Classification for Scalable Deep RLcited by 144
- 2023Q-Transformer: Scalable Offline Reinforcement Learning via Autoregressive Q-Functionscited by 131
- 2022When Should We Prefer Offline Reinforcement Learning Over Behavioral Cloning?cited by 89
- 2020COG: Connecting New Skills to Past Experience with Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 83
- 2022When does return-conditioned supervised learning work for offline reinforcement learning?cited by 76
- 2023Zero-Shot Goal-Directed Dialogue via RL on Imagined Conversationscited by 38
- 2021Nearly Horizon-Free Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 36
- 2022Context-Aware Language Modeling for Goal-Oriented Dialogue Systemscited by 22
- 2023On the Effectiveness of Offline RL for Dialogue Response Generationcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 8; 2026: 2.
10 papers.
- 2025Implicit Reward as the Bridge: A Unified View of SFT and DPO Connectionscited by 17
- 2025Offline RL by Reward-Weighted Fine-Tuning for Conversation Optimizationcited by 10
- 2025Evolutionary Guided Decoding: Iterative Value Refinement for LLMscited by 3
- 2025ShiQ: Bringing back Bellman to LLMscited by 3
- 2025Post-Completion Learning for Language Modelscited by 3
- 2025Iterative GRPO: Batch-Online Multi-Turn RL via Single-Turn RLHFcited by 3
- 2026Supervised Fine-Tuning versus Reinforcement Learning: A Study of Post-Training Methods for Large Language Modelscited by 3
- 2025Provably Efficient and Agile Randomized Q-Learningcited by 2
- 2025AAPA: Adversarially Anchored Preference Alignment for Post-Training of Large Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026From Weak Data to Strong Policy: Q-Targets Enable Provable In-Context Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026From Weak Data to Strong Policy: Q-Targets Enable Provable In-Context Reinforcement Learning24 Sep 2026
- 2026Supervised Fine-Tuning versus Reinforcement Learning: A Study of Post-Training Methods for Large Language Models14 Mar 2026
- 2025Iterative GRPO: Batch-Online Multi-Turn RL via Single-Turn RLHF26 Nov 2025
- 2025AAPA: Adversarially Anchored Preference Alignment for Post-Training of Large Language Models29 Sep 2025
- 2025Post-Completion Learning for Language Models27 Jul 2025
- 2025Provably Efficient and Agile Randomized Q-Learning30 Jun 2025
- 2025Implicit Reward as the Bridge: A Unified View of SFT and DPO Connections15 Jun 2025
- 2025Offline RL by Reward-Weighted Fine-Tuning for Conversation Optimization8 Jun 2025
- 2025ShiQ: Bringing back Bellman to LLMs16 May 2025
- 2025Evolutionary Guided Decoding: Iterative Value Refinement for LLMs4 Mar 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Benefits and Pitfalls of Reinforcement Learning for Language Model Planning: A Theoretical Perspective
- 2025Learning What Reinforcement Learning Can't: Interleaved Online Fine-Tuning for Hardest Questions
- 2023Cal-QL: Calibrated Offline RL Pre-Training for Efficient Online Fine-Tuning
- 2025KL-Regularised Q-Learning: A Token-level Action-Value perspective on Online RLHF
- 2026Do You Really Need to Pretrain Q-Functions for Online RL Fine-Tuning?
- 2025Towards a Unified View of Large Language Model Post-Training
- 2025SRFT: A Single-Stage Method with Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Reasoning
- 2025VLM Q-Learning: Aligning Vision-Language Models for Interactive Decision-Making