Evolutionary Guided Decoding: Iterative Value Refinement for LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While guided decoding, especially value-guided methods, has emerged as a cost-effective alternative for controlling language model outputs without re-training models, its effectiveness is limited by the accuracy of the value function. We identify that this inaccuracy stems from a core distributional gap: existing methods train static value functions on trajectories sampled exclusively from the base policy, which inherently confines their training to a narrow and suboptimal view of the potential output space. We propose Iterative Value Refinement, a evolutionary framework designed to narrow this gap. It employs Value Exploration to provide a more comprehensive and robust training signal, complemented by Iterative Self-Refinement, which uses the improved value function from one iteration to guide the generation of higher-quality data for the next. Extensive experiments on text summarization, multi-turn dialogue, and instruction following demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework in aligning language models. Our approach not only achieves alignment but also significantly reduces computational costs by leveraging principled value function optimization for efficient and effective control.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2025.
Builds on
28 of 40 references.
References · 28
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
- 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,056
- 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferencescited by 906
- 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
- 2019Advantage-Weighted Regression: Simple and Scalable Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 750
- 2021DExperts: Decoding-Time Controlled Text Generation with Experts and Anti-Expertscited by 434
- 2021FUDGE: Controlled Text Generation With Future Discriminatorscited by 374
16 more
- 2023Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraintcited by 346
- 2024Skywork-Reward: Bag of Tricks for Reward Modeling in LLMscited by 322
- 2023Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part I: PPOcited by 226
- 2024SALAD-Bench: A Hierarchical and Comprehensive Safety Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 225
- 2022COLD Decoding: Energy-based Constrained Text Generation with Langevin Dynamicscited by 159
- 2022Offline RL for Natural Language Generation with Implicit Language Q Learningcited by 137
- 2024ARGS: Alignment as Reward-Guided Searchcited by 99
- 2025PRMBench: A Fine-grained and Challenging Benchmark for Process-Level Reward Modelscited by 98
- 2023Don't throw away your value model! Generating more preferable text with Value-Guided Monte-Carlo Tree Search decodingcited by 59
- 2024Online Iterative Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with General Preference Modelcited by 52
- 2023Controlled Text Generation via Language Model Arithmeticcited by 51
- 2024Value Augmented Sampling for Language Model Alignment and Personalizationcited by 49
- 2022Critic-Guided Decoding for Controlled Text Generationcited by 45
- 2024ROSE Doesn't Do That: Boosting the Safety of Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models with Reverse Prompt Contrastive Decodingcited by 32
- 2024Inference-Time Language Model Alignment via Integrated Value Guidancecited by 19
- 2024Q-SFT: Q-Learning for Language Models via Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Toward Stable Value Alignment: Introducing Independent Modules for Consistent Value Guidance
- 2026VISA: Value Injection via Shielded Adaptation for Personalized LLM Alignment
- 2025Internal Value Alignment in Large Language Models through Controlled Value Vector Activation
- 2026Controllable Value Alignment in Large Language Models through Neuron-Level Editing
- 2025Collab: Controlled Decoding using Mixture of Agents for LLM Alignment
- 2024DeAL: Decoding-time Alignment for Large Language Models
- 2024Nudging: Inference-time Alignment of LLMs via Guided Decoding
- 2026Gradient-Guided Reward Optimization for Inference-time Alignment