ShiQ: Bringing back Bellman to LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The fine-tuning of pre-trained large language models (LLMs) using reinforcement learning (RL) is generally formulated as direct policy optimization. This approach was naturally favored as it efficiently improves a pretrained LLM, seen as an initial policy. Another RL paradigm, Q-learning methods, has received far less attention in the LLM community while demonstrating major success in various non-LLM RL tasks. In particular, Q-learning effectiveness comes from its sample efficiency and ability to learn offline, which is particularly valuable given the high computational cost of sampling with LLMs. However, naively applying a Q-learning-style update to the model's logits is ineffective due to the specificity of LLMs. Our core contribution is to derive theoretically grounded loss functions from Bellman equations to adapt Q-learning methods to LLMs. To do so, we carefully adapt insights from the RL literature to account for LLM-specific characteristics, ensuring that the logits become reliable Q-value estimates. We then use this loss to build a practical algorithm, ShiQ for Shifted-Q, that supports off-policy, token-wise learning while remaining simple to implement. Finally, we evaluate ShiQ on both synthetic data and real-world benchmarks, e.g., UltraFeedback and BFCL-V3, demonstrating its effectiveness in both single-turn and multi-turn LLM settings
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 May 2025.
Builds on
36 of 55 references.
References · 36
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,417
- 2023Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIscited by 1,332
- 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,293
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 963
- 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferencescited by 912
- 2017Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 786
24 more
- 2015Dueling Network Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 785
- 2023SLiC-HF: Sequence Likelihood Calibration with Human Feedbackcited by 401
- 2022CodeRL: Mastering Code Generation through Pretrained Models and Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 358
- 2019A Theory of Regularized Markov Decision Processescited by 286
- 2016Safe and Efficient Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 264
- 2024From r to Q^*: Your Language Model is Secretly a Q-Functioncited by 242
- 2024ArCHer: Training Language Model Agents via Hierarchical Multi-Turn RLcited by 228
- 2017Bridging the Gap Between Value and Policy Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 182
- 2024Generalized Preference Optimization: A Unified Approach to Offline Alignmentcited by 157
- 2022Offline RL for Natural Language Generation with Implicit Language Q Learningcited by 138
- 2024Adam-mini: Use Fewer Learning Rates To Gain Morecited by 137
- 2023Factually Consistent Summarization via Reinforcement Learning with Textual Entailment Feedbackcited by 72
- 2020Munchausen Reinforcement Learningcited by 69
- 2024Multi-turn Reinforcement Learning from Preference Human Feedbackcited by 67
- 2024Building Math Agents with Multi-Turn Iterative Preference Learningcited by 66
- 2025Command A: An Enterprise-Ready Large Language Modelcited by 59
- 2024Offline Regularised Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Models Alignmentcited by 48
- 2021Efficient (Soft) Q-Learning for Text Generation with Limited Good Datacited by 37
- 2024Enhancing Multi-Step Reasoning Abilities of Language Models through Direct Q-Function Optimizationcited by 22
- 2023B-Coder: Value-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning for Program Synthesiscited by 17
- 2024Contrastive Policy Gradient: Aligning LLMs on sequence-level scores in a supervised-friendly fashioncited by 13
- 2025RL-finetuning LLMs from on- and off-policy data with a single algorithmcited by 11
- 2024Q-SFT: Q-Learning for Language Models via Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 10
- 2024Averaging log-likelihoods in direct alignmentcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2025Autoregressive Language Models are Secretly Energy-Based Models: Insights into the Lookahead Capabilities of Next-Token Predictioncited by 8
- 2025TROLL: Trust Regions improve Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Modelscited by 7
- 2026Modularized Reinforcement Learning on LLMs: From MDP Creation to Exploration and Learningcited by 2
- 2026Modularized Reinforcement Learning on LLMs: From MDP Creation to Exploration and Learning20 Jun 2026
- 2025Autoregressive Language Models are Secretly Energy-Based Models: Insights into the Lookahead Capabilities of Next-Token Prediction17 Dec 2025
- 2025TROLL: Trust Regions improve Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Models4 Oct 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Enhancing Q-Learning with Large Language Model Heuristics
- 2024How Can LLM Guide RL? A Value-Based Approach
- 2025Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMs
- 2025Trajectory Bellman Residual Minimization: A Simple Value-Based Method for LLM Reasoning
- 2024Q-Adapter: Customizing Pre-trained LLMs to New Preferences with Forgetting Mitigation
- 2024Reinforcement Learning for LLM Post-Training: A Survey
- 2024Reinforcement Learning Enhanced LLMs: A Survey
- 2026Supervised Fine-Tuning versus Reinforcement Learning: A Study of Post-Training Methods for Large Language Models