mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

BenchAgents: Multi-Agent Systems for Structured Benchmark Creation

arXiv 2410.22584 ↗First posted 29 Oct 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 9

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluation insights are limited by the availability of high-quality benchmarks. As models evolve, there is a need to create benchmarks that can measure progress on new and complex generative capabilities. However, manually creating new benchmarks is slow and expensive, restricting comprehensive evaluations for any capability. We introduce BenchAgents, a multi-agent framework that methodically leverages large language models (LLMs) to automate evaluation benchmark creation while inherently ensuring data and (evaluation) metric quality. BenchAgents decomposes the benchmark creation process into planning, generation, verification, and evaluation, each of which is ] orchestrated via LLM agents. These agents interact with each other and utilize feedback from benchmark developers to improve and flexibly control data diversity and quality. We use BenchAgents to create benchmarks to evaluate capabilities related to planning, constraint satisfaction, and causal reasoning spanning both language and vision modalities. We then use these benchmarks to study state-of-the-art models and extract new insights into common failure modes and model differences.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 15 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2024.

Builds on

15 of 24 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Benchmark Self-Evolving: A Multi-Agent Framework for Dynamic LLM Evaluation18 Feb

Other references · 14

  1. 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,506
  2. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
  3. 2019CLEVRER: CoLlision Events for Video REpresentation and Reasoningcited by 484
  4. 2019PHYRE: A New Benchmark for Physical Reasoningcited by 137
  5. 2023DyVal: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Reasoning Taskscited by 101
  6. 2024FOFO: A Benchmark to Evaluate LLMs' Format-Following Capabilitycited by 80
  7. 2023COLLIE: Systematic Construction of Constrained Text Generation Taskscited by 70
  8. 2023Attention Satisfies: A Constraint-Satisfaction Lens on Factual Errors of Language Modelscited by 67
  9. 2020CRAFT: A Benchmark for Causal Reasoning About Forces and inTeractionscited by 44
  10. 2024Top Leaderboard Ranking = Top Coding Proficiency, Always? EvoEval: Evolving Coding Benchmarks via LLMcited by 40
  11. 2024Eureka: Evaluating and Understanding Large Foundation Modelscited by 18
  12. 2024Assessing and Verifying Task Utility in LLM-Powered Applicationscited by 16
2 more
  1. 2024Language model developers should report train-test overlapcited by 16
  2. 2023KITAB: Evaluating LLMs on Constraint Satisfaction for Information Retrievalcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 8.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026EvalBuilder: Can LLMs Build Efficient Benchmarks?
  2. 2024AgentQuest: A Modular Benchmark Framework to Measure Progress and Improve LLM Agents
  3. 2026ClawArena-Team: Benchmarking Subagent Orchestration and Dynamic Workflows in Language-Model Agents
  4. 2026AgentGym2: Benchmarking Large Language Model Agents in De-Idealized Real-World Environments
  5. 2026The Double Measurement Confound in Agent Benchmarks: De-Scaffolding, Ground-Truth Scoring, and Reliability Beyond the Mean
  6. 2025Automating Benchmark Design
  7. 2026AgencyBench: Benchmarking the Frontiers of Autonomous Agents in 1M-Token Real-World Contexts
  8. 2026AgentCompass: A Unified Evaluation Infrastructure for Agent Capabilities