Assessing and Verifying Task Utility in LLM-Powered Applications
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) has led to a surge in applications that facilitate collaboration among multiple agents, assisting humans in their daily tasks. However, a significant gap remains in assessing to what extent LLM-powered applications genuinely enhance user experience and task execution efficiency. This highlights the need to verify utility of LLM-powered applications, particularly by ensuring alignment between the application's functionality and end-user needs. We introduce AgentEval, a novel framework designed to simplify the utility verification process by automatically proposing a set of criteria tailored to the unique purpose of any given application. This allows for a comprehensive assessment, quantifying the utility of an application against the suggested criteria. We present a comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness and robustness of AgentEval for two open source datasets including Math Problem solving and ALFWorld House-hold related tasks. For reproducibility purposes, we make the data, code and all the logs publicly available at https://bit.ly/3w3yKcS .
Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 May 2024.
Builds on
36 of 61 references.
References · 36
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,761
- 2019PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answeringcited by 1,271
- 2020ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learningcited by 1,143
- 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,084
- 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,050
- 2023Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 995
- 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 965
- 2019ALFRED: A Benchmark for Interpreting Grounded Instructions for Everyday Taskscited by 773
- 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 729
24 more
- 2023ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 724
- 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 712
- 2020Aligning AI With Shared Human Valuescited by 706
- 2023Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Studycited by 420
- 2023Multi-Agent Collaboration: Harnessing the Power of Intelligent LLM Agentscited by 329
- 2018TextWorld: A Learning Environment for Text-based Gamescited by 304
- 2023On the Robustness of ChatGPT: An Adversarial and Out-of-distribution Perspectivecited by 208
- 2023Evaluating Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 200
- 2023Do LLMs exhibit human-like response biases? A case study in survey designcited by 176
- 2019What makes a good conversation? How controllable attributes affect human judgmentscited by 140
- 2024Autonomous Evaluation and Refinement of Digital Agentscited by 136
- 2024Beyond Functional Correctness: Exploring Hallucinations in LLM-Generated Codecited by 106
- 2023Multi-Dimensional Evaluation of Text Summarization with In-Context Learningcited by 44
- 2024Can Large Language Models be Trusted for Evaluation? Scalable Meta-Evaluation of LLMs as Evaluators via Agent Debatecited by 40
- 2023Goal Representations for Instruction Following: A Semi-Supervised Language Interface to Controlcited by 32
- 2023Creative Agents: Empowering Agents with Imagination for Creative Taskscited by 24
- 2022Interactive Grounded Language Understanding in a Collaborative Environment: IGLU 2021cited by 23
- 2023Exploring the Reliability of Large Language Models as Customized Evaluators for Diverse NLP Taskscited by 23
- 2022Aligning Offline Metrics and Human Judgments of Value for Code Generation Modelscited by 14
- 2022Semantic-Oriented Unlabeled Priming for Large-Scale Language Modelscited by 12
- 2023From Voices to Validity: Leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) for Textual Analysis of Policy Stakeholder Interviewscited by 8
- 2021DEUS: A Data-driven Approach to Estimate User Satisfaction in Multi-turn Dialoguescited by 7
- 2017Evaluating Personal Assistants on Mobile devicescited by 3
- 2020Optimizing Interactive Systems via Data-Driven Objectivescited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 7; 2026: 4.
15 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?cited by 559
- 2025TRAIL: Trace Reasoning and Agentic Issue Localizationcited by 98
- 2025Benchmarking Prompt Sensitivity in Large Language Modelscited by 38
- 2025DoVer: Intervention-Driven Auto Debugging for LLM Multi-Agent Systemscited by 23
- 2024Towards Effective GenAI Multi-Agent Collaboration: Design and Evaluation for Enterprise Applicationscited by 19
- 2025A Human-AI Comparative Analysis of Prompt Sensitivity in LLM-Based Relevance Judgmentcited by 15
- 2025Benchmarking LLM-based Relevance Judgment Methodscited by 14
- 2024BenchAgents: Multi-Agent Systems for Structured Benchmark Creationcited by 6
- 2026Tracing the Data Trail: A Survey of Data Provenance, Transparency and Traceability in LLMscited by 3
- 2026The Hitchhikers Guide to Rubric Quality Understanding and Enrichmentcited by 3
- 2024LLM-Human Pipeline for Cultural Context Grounding of Conversationscited by 2
- 2026PReMISE: Policy Rubrics as Measurement Specifications for LLM Judgescited by 2
3 more
- 2024IDAT: A Multi-Modal Dataset and Toolkit for Building and Evaluating Interactive Task-Solving Agentscited by 1
- 2025PersonaMatrix: A Recipe for Persona-Aware Evaluation of Legal Summarizationcited by 0
- 2026From Performance to Purpose: A Sociotechnical Taxonomy for Evaluating Large Language Model Utilitycited by 0
- 2026PReMISE: Policy Rubrics as Measurement Specifications for LLM Judges29 May 2026
- 2026The Hitchhikers Guide to Rubric Quality Understanding and Enrichment1 Apr 2026
- 2026From Performance to Purpose: A Sociotechnical Taxonomy for Evaluating Large Language Model Utility24 Feb 2026
- 2026Tracing the Data Trail: A Survey of Data Provenance, Transparency and Traceability in LLMs19 Jan 2026
- 2025DoVer: Intervention-Driven Auto Debugging for LLM Multi-Agent Systems7 Dec 2025
- 2025PersonaMatrix: A Recipe for Persona-Aware Evaluation of Legal Summarization19 Sep 2025
- 2025TRAIL: Trace Reasoning and Agentic Issue Localization13 May 2025
- 2025Benchmarking LLM-based Relevance Judgment Methods17 Apr 2025
- 2025A Human-AI Comparative Analysis of Prompt Sensitivity in LLM-Based Relevance Judgment16 Apr 2025
- 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?17 Mar 2025
- 2025Benchmarking Prompt Sensitivity in Large Language Models9 Feb 2025
- 2024Towards Effective GenAI Multi-Agent Collaboration: Design and Evaluation for Enterprise Applications6 Dec 2024
- 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?cited by 559
- 2025DoVer: Intervention-Driven Auto Debugging for LLM Multi-Agent Systemscited by 23
- 2024Towards Effective GenAI Multi-Agent Collaboration: Design and Evaluation for Enterprise Applicationscited by 19
- 2024BenchAgents: Multi-Agent Systems for Structured Benchmark Creationcited by 6
- 2025DoVer: Intervention-Driven Auto Debugging for LLM Multi-Agent Systems7 Dec 2025
- 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?17 Mar 2025
- 2024Towards Effective GenAI Multi-Agent Collaboration: Design and Evaluation for Enterprise Applications6 Dec 2024
- 2024BenchAgents: Multi-Agent Systems for Structured Benchmark Creation29 Oct 2024
- 2025TRAIL: Trace Reasoning and Agentic Issue Localizationcited by 98
- 2025TRAIL: Trace Reasoning and Agentic Issue Localization13 May 2025
- 2025Benchmarking Prompt Sensitivity in Large Language Modelscited by 38
- 2025A Human-AI Comparative Analysis of Prompt Sensitivity in LLM-Based Relevance Judgmentcited by 15
- 2025Benchmarking LLM-based Relevance Judgment Methodscited by 14
- 2026Tracing the Data Trail: A Survey of Data Provenance, Transparency and Traceability in LLMscited by 3
- 2026The Hitchhikers Guide to Rubric Quality Understanding and Enrichmentcited by 3
- 2024LLM-Human Pipeline for Cultural Context Grounding of Conversationscited by 2
- 2026PReMISE: Policy Rubrics as Measurement Specifications for LLM Judgescited by 2
- 2024IDAT: A Multi-Modal Dataset and Toolkit for Building and Evaluating Interactive Task-Solving Agentscited by 1
- 2025PersonaMatrix: A Recipe for Persona-Aware Evaluation of Legal Summarizationcited by 0
- 2026From Performance to Purpose: A Sociotechnical Taxonomy for Evaluating Large Language Model Utilitycited by 0
- 2026PReMISE: Policy Rubrics as Measurement Specifications for LLM Judges29 May 2026
- 2026The Hitchhikers Guide to Rubric Quality Understanding and Enrichment1 Apr 2026
- 2026From Performance to Purpose: A Sociotechnical Taxonomy for Evaluating Large Language Model Utility24 Feb 2026
- 2026Tracing the Data Trail: A Survey of Data Provenance, Transparency and Traceability in LLMs19 Jan 2026
- 2025PersonaMatrix: A Recipe for Persona-Aware Evaluation of Legal Summarization19 Sep 2025
- 2025Benchmarking LLM-based Relevance Judgment Methods17 Apr 2025
- 2025A Human-AI Comparative Analysis of Prompt Sensitivity in LLM-Based Relevance Judgment16 Apr 2025
- 2025Benchmarking Prompt Sensitivity in Large Language Models9 Feb 2025
- 2024LLM-Human Pipeline for Cultural Context Grounding of Conversations17 Oct 2024
- 2024IDAT: A Multi-Modal Dataset and Toolkit for Building and Evaluating Interactive Task-Solving Agents12 Jul 2024