mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ChartBmkAgent: Harness-Governed Multi-Agent Construction of Chart QA Benchmarks from Sparse Error-Taxonomy Specifications

arXiv 2610.08106 ↗First posted 6 Oct 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Chart understanding and anomaly detection

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) advance rapidly, while conventional benchmark development lags behind, delaying investigation of newly observed capability gaps. Such investigation requires an expressive task format and an on-demand construction process: information-rich charts make chart question answering (Chart QA) suitable for probing coupled perception and reasoning. Automated Chart QA construction is intended to shorten the benchmark-development cycle by turning identified gaps into targeted samples on demand. Current methods, however, commonly separate target guidance from scratch generation: target-guided systems often require prepared data, charts, or templates, while scratch-generation systems primarily ensure artifact validity, without explicitly controlling whether newly synthesized requirements and content remain aligned with an externally specified diagnostic target. We introduce ChartBmkAgent, which turns an identified capability gap into targeted diagnostic evidence by constructing complete Chart QA samples from sparse error-taxonomy specifications. Throughout construction, a central harness governs specialized agents, requires stage-specific evidence of alignment with the original error category, and records the basis for each acceptance decision. On 300 taxonomy-wide samples, MLLM accuracies ranged from 32.7% to 84.3% with distinct category profiles, showing that generated samples reveal capability differences. Across three source-model comparisons, targeted follow-ups scored 50.0% versus 82.2% on matched controls (p=8.96×10-6); all six cross-model comparisons had the same direction, demonstrating targeted validation and diagnostic-data generation. Multiple evaluator models assessed whether each sample tested its specified error category; 86.4% met this criterion, providing empirical evidence of target preservation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Chart understanding and anomaly detection, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025ChartCitor: Multi-Agent Framework for Fine-Grained Chart Visual Attribution
  2. 2026Chartographer: Counterfactual Chart Generation for Evaluating Vision-Language Models
  3. 2026LongChart VQA: A Comprehensive Benchmark for MLLMs with Complex Multi-Chart Reasoning
  4. 2025Chart-HQA: A Benchmark for Hypothetical Question Answering in Charts
  5. 2025Judging the Judges: Can Large Vision-Language Models Fairly Evaluate Chart Comprehension and Reasoning?
  6. 2026ChartVerse: Scaling Chart Reasoning via Reliable Programmatic Synthesis from Scratch
  7. 2024MultiChartQA: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models on Multi-Chart Problems
  8. 2024CharXiv: Charting Gaps in Realistic Chart Understanding in Multimodal LLMs