Benchmark Everything Everywhere All at Once
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Benchmarks are fundamental for evaluating and advancing LLMs and MLLMs by providing standardized and explicit measures of performance. However, their construction is labor-intensive and hard to reuse, raising concerns about sustainability and scalability. Moreover, existing benchmarks often quickly reach performance saturation after their release, resulting in insufficient discrimination among state-of-the-art models. To address these challenges, we introduce Benchmark Agent, a fully autonomous agentic system designed for benchmark building. Our framework orchestrates the complete benchmark construction pipeline, from user query analysis and subtask design to data annotation and quality control. To assess Benchmark Agent, we implement it to produce 15 representative benchmarks, spanning diverse evaluation scenarios, including text understanding, multimodal understanding, and domain-specific reasoning. Extensive experiments, including human evaluation, LLM-as-a-judge assessment, and consistency checks, demonstrate Benchmark Agent can generate high-quality benchmark samples with minimal human involvement. More importantly, through continual evaluation, we observe several insightful findings, including that current models struggle with certain domain-specific reasoning tasks. We believe that rapidly evolving benchmarks can contribute significantly to the research community. The preview and code will be publicly available at the demo page and code repository.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 52 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2026.
Builds on
52 of 60 references.
References · 52
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,418
- 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,151
- 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,273
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
- 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,105
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
- 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,696
- 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,628
38 more
- 2023MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contextscited by 1,582
- 2025InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiencycited by 1,419
- 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,211
- 2025OpenAI GPT-5 System Cardcited by 910
- 2024Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?cited by 893
- 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 729
- 2023ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 724
- 2024MathVerse: Does Your Multi-modal LLM Truly See the Diagrams in Visual Math Problems?cited by 573
- 2024MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmarkcited by 494
- 2024MLLM-as-a-Judge: Assessing Multimodal LLM-as-a-Judge with Vision-Language Benchmarkcited by 362
- 2023GPTScore: Evaluate as You Desirecited by 357
- 2023JudgeLM: Fine-tuned Large Language Models are Scalable Judgescited by 351
- 2024MME-RealWorld: Could Your Multimodal LLM Challenge High-Resolution Real-World Scenarios that are Difficult for Humans?cited by 284
- 2025LLaVA-OneVision-1.5: Fully Open Framework for Democratized Multimodal Trainingcited by 233
- 2024Agent-as-a-Judge: Evaluate Agents with Agentscited by 223
- 2024Mobile-Agent-v2: Mobile Device Operation Assistant with Effective Navigation via Multi-Agent Collaborationcited by 187
- 2024Autonomous Evaluation and Refinement of Digital Agentscited by 136
- 2023Language Prompt for Autonomous Drivingcited by 110
- 2023DyVal: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Reasoning Taskscited by 100
- 2025Learn-by-interact: A Data-Centric Framework for Self-Adaptive Agents in Realistic Environmentscited by 93
- 2025AI-Researcher: Autonomous Scientific Innovationcited by 88
- 2025MiroThinker: Pushing the Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Research Agents via Model, Context, and Interactive Scalingcited by 72
- 2026CL-bench: A Benchmark for Context Learningcited by 46
- 2024Evaluation Agent: Efficient and Promptable Evaluation Framework for Visual Generative Modelscited by 41
- 2024Synthetic Dialogue Dataset Generation using LLM Agentscited by 39
- 2024AutoBench: Automatic Testbench Generation and Evaluation Using LLMs for HDL Designcited by 38
- 2025RoboOS: A Hierarchical Embodied Framework for Cross-Embodiment and Multi-Agent Collaborationcited by 28
- 2024Arena Learning: Build Data Flywheel for LLMs Post-training via Simulated Chatbot Arenacited by 26
- 2025Paper2Video: Automatic Video Generation from Scientific Paperscited by 23
- 2025DataFlow: An LLM-Driven Framework for Unified Data Preparation and Workflow Automation in the Era of Data-Centric AIcited by 22
- 2025On Path to Multimodal Generalist: General-Level and General-Benchcited by 18
- 2025SpaceVista: All-Scale Visual Spatial Reasoning from mm to kmcited by 18
- 2025Agent-X: Evaluating Deep Multimodal Reasoning in Vision-Centric Agentic Taskscited by 17
- 2026Benchmark^2: Systematic Evaluation of LLM Benchmarkscited by 11
- 2025UnitCoder: Scalable Iterative Code Synthesis with Unit Test Guidancecited by 7
- 2024BenchAgents: Multi-Agent Systems for Structured Benchmark Creationcited by 6
- 2026One-Eval: An Agentic System for Automated and Traceable LLM Evaluationcited by 4
- 2025TAGAL: Tabular Data Generation using Agentic LLM Methodscited by 3
50 most cited of 52 All 52 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026NexForge: Scaling Agent Capabilities through Requirement-Driven Task Synthesis for LLMscited by 4
- 2026FinCUABuild: Can Agents Build Reliable Benchmarks for Dynamic Financial Computer Use?cited by 0
- 2026Benchmark Radar: A Living Database and Search Engine for AI Benchmarks and Evaluationcited by 0
- 2026TraceDance: An Automated System for Building Agent Behavior Benchmarks from Real-World Agent Deployment Tracescited by 0
- 2026MedBenchAgent: Towards Systematic Automation of Medical VLM Benchmark Constructioncited by 0
- 2026MedBenchAgent: Towards Systematic Automation of Medical VLM Benchmark Construction8 Oct 2026
- 2026TraceDance: An Automated System for Building Agent Behavior Benchmarks from Real-World Agent Deployment Traces27 Sep 2026
- 2026Benchmark Radar: A Living Database and Search Engine for AI Benchmarks and Evaluation10 Sep 2026
- 2026FinCUABuild: Can Agents Build Reliable Benchmarks for Dynamic Financial Computer Use?7 Sep 2026
- 2026NexForge: Scaling Agent Capabilities through Requirement-Driven Task Synthesis for LLMs15 Jul 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024AgentQuest: A Modular Benchmark Framework to Measure Progress and Improve LLM Agents
- 2025Towards Adaptive ML Benchmarks: Web-Agent-Driven Construction, Domain Expansion, and Metric Optimization
- 2025FML-bench: Benchmarking Machine Learning Agents for Scientific Research
- 2026AgentHPOBench: A Benchmark For Evaluating LLM Agents as Sequential Hyperparameter Optimizers
- 2024Benchmark Self-Evolving: A Multi-Agent Framework for Dynamic LLM Evaluation
- 2026Benchmark Test-Time Scaling of General LLM Agents
- 2026Automated Benchmark Auditing for AI Agents and Large Language Models
- 2026Benchmarking LLM Judges for Mobile Agent Evaluation